The (un)lucky country: the problem of the single antipodean case study and what to do about it

Single-case studies, though once the foundation of political science, have become a high-risk strategy in the discipline. The risk is especially acute for scholars who do rich qualitative work about New Zealand and Australia. There is a double bind. On the one hand, the community studying Antipodean politics is not large enough or sufficiently well-defined to ignore trends and mores overseas. On the other hand, Antipodean politics is not exotic or important enough to command the attention of the larger discipline. The danger lies in ‘falling off the map’. We consider the problem this poses for academic careers. We then outline a menu of strategies for surviving this double bind using the practices of comparative interpretive research. We posit that a more clear-eyed acknowledgement of the problem can lead to the conscious embracing of these strategies and the potential they offer for immersive case research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Australian Journal of Political Science
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/10361146.2025.2454567
Primary Topic
Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The (un)lucky country: the problem of the single antipodean case study and what to do about it

Jack Corbett, John Boswell, R. A. W. Rhodes
Australian Journal of Political Science
Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
article

The (un)lucky country: the problem of the single antipodean case study and what to do about it

Jack Corbett, John Boswell, R. A. W. Rhodes
article en

Abstract

Single-case studies, though once the foundation of political science, have become a high-risk strategy in the discipline. The risk is especially acute for scholars who do rich qualitative work about New Zealand and Australia. There is a double bind. On the one hand, the community studying Antipodean politics is not large enough or sufficiently well-defined to ignore trends and mores overseas. On the other hand, Antipodean politics is not exotic or important enough to command the attention of the larger discipline. The danger lies in ‘falling off the map’. We consider the problem this poses for academic careers. We then outline a menu of strategies for surviving this double bind using the practices of comparative interpretive research. We posit that a more clear-eyed acknowledgement of the problem can lead to the conscious embracing of these strategies and the potential they offer for immersive case research.

Australian Journal of Political ScienceVol. 59(4)
Australian Regenerative Medicine Institute (AU), University of Southampton (GB), Monash University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.