LEIBNIZ’S MEREOLOGY: A LOGICAL RECONSTRUCTION

Abstract The aim of this paper is to give a full exposition of Leibniz’s mereological system. My starting point will be his papers on Real Addition, and the distinction between the containment and the part-whole relation. In the first part (§2), I expound the Real Addition calculus; in the second part (§3), I introduce the mereological calculus by restricting the containment relation via the notion of homogeneity which results in the parthood relation (this corresponds to an extension of the Real Addition calculus via what I call the Homogeneity axiom). I analyze in detail such a notion, and argue that it implies a gunk conception of (proper) part. Finally, in the third part (§4), I scrutinize some of the applications of the containment-parthood distinction showing that a number of famous Leibnizian doctrines depend on it.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Review of Symbolic Logic
Published
2025-02-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s1755020325000012
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Medieval and Classical Philosophy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
34.53

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

LEIBNIZ’S MEREOLOGY: A LOGICAL RECONSTRUCTION

Filippo Costantini
2 citations
The Review of Symbolic Logic
Medieval and Classical Philosophy
34.53
article

LEIBNIZ’S MEREOLOGY: A LOGICAL RECONSTRUCTION

Filippo Costantini
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract The aim of this paper is to give a full exposition of Leibniz’s mereological system. My starting point will be his papers on Real Addition, and the distinction between the containment and the part-whole relation. In the first part (§2), I expound the Real Addition calculus; in the second part (§3), I introduce the mereological calculus by restricting the containment relation via the notion of homogeneity which results in the parthood relation (this corresponds to an extension of the Real Addition calculus via what I call the Homogeneity axiom). I analyze in detail such a notion, and argue that it implies a gunk conception of (proper) part. Finally, in the third part (§4), I scrutinize some of the applications of the containment-parthood distinction showing that a number of famous Leibnizian doctrines depend on it.

The Review of Symbolic LogicVol. 18(2)
Ca' Foscari University of Venice (IT)
European Commission, Research Executive Agency, Leibniz-Gemeinschaft
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Medieval and Classical Philosophy
34.53
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.