Mega-analysis of structural magnetic resonance imaging in 493 patients with functional neurological disorder

<h3>Background</h3> Despite a resurgence of research in functional neurological disorder (FND), knowledge of its pathophysiology is limited. To date, structural neuroimaging studies have typically been underpowered and have produced heterogenous findings. Mega-analyses combine individual raw participant data from multiple studies, substantially increasing statistical power and the ability to probe the complex pathophysiology of FND. <h3>Methods</h3> In this FND Society Neuroimaging Committee initiative, international research groups with magnetic resonance imaging data of functional motor or seizure patients and healthy controls were invited to send T1-weighted images (pre-processed or unprocessed) and associated clinical variables. Key morphometric features such as cortical thickness, cortical surface area, and subcortical volumes were extracted using the Destrieux cortical atlas (Freesurfer 6.0.0) and harmonised to account for multi-centre variance with an empirical Bayesian approach (ComBat). Following ANOVAs corrected for multiple comparisons, cohorts were compared with MANCOVAs adjusted for age, sex, and total intracranial volume. <h3>Results</h3> Fifteen groups contributed. The final dataset consisted of 564 age- and sex-matched controls and 493 patients, some of whom had both symptom subtypes (overall 314 motor symptoms, 193 seizures). Mean age 38.1 years for FND; 75.5% female. The FND cohort showed reduced cortical thickness in regions including the bilateral paracentral gyri and sulci, bilateral superior precentral sulci, and bilateral superior frontal sulci; varying fontal, occipital, and temporal regions showed reduced cortical surface area; volumes were reduced in regions including the bilateral putamen and hippocampi. In every case, the differences were small (η<sub>p</sub><sup>2</sup> &lt;0.016). Significant regions survived a manual leave-one-out analysis. The motor FND subtype contributed most to the differences. Binarised clinical variables were available for ~60% patients. Some of the reduced cortical thicknesses, particularly in the superior frontal and precentral regions, were associated with a history of depression. None of the differences were associated with history of anxiety, antidepressant use, or illness duration (years). <h3>Discussion</h3> This international collaboration mega-analysis represents the largest structural imaging study in FND to date. Results suggest FND is associated with small reductions in cortical thickness, surface area, and volumes, particularly in frontal, motor, and subcortical regions. Future research should investigate whether findings are of aetiological significance or are secondary to the condition, and whether they are specific to FND or are also seen in related disorders. Further granular analysis, for example via receptor density mapping, could further elucidate the pathophysiology of this disabling disorder. Consensus regarding the minimum clinical variables to collect in future FND research is required.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2024-bnpa.7
Primary Topic
Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mega-analysis of structural magnetic resonance imaging in 493 patients with functional neurological disorder

Jeannette Gelauff, Timothy R. Nicholson, Thomas Hassa, Mitul A. Mehta et al.
Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
article

Mega-analysis of structural magnetic resonance imaging in 493 patients with functional neurological disorder

Jeannette Gelauff, Timothy R. Nicholson, Thomas Hassa, Mitul A. Mehta, Wesley T. Kerr, Noriko Salamon, Johannes Jungilligens, Jerzy P. Szaflarski, Jacobus F.A. Jansen, Enrico Premi, Ibai Díez, Aleksandar J. Ristić, Matthew Butler, M. de Koning-Tijssen, Sara Paredes-Echeverri, Mauro Magoni, Quinton Deeley, Ariel Schoenfeld, Daichi Sone, Selma Aybek, Jane B. Allendorfer, David L. Perez, Miriam Vignando, John M. Stern, Tereza Serranová, Barbara Borroni, Silvina G. Horovitz, Lenny Ramesh Sankratjardj Marapin, Mark Hallet, Petr Sojka, Noriko Sato, Dawn S Elashiv
article en

Abstract

<h3>Background</h3> Despite a resurgence of research in functional neurological disorder (FND), knowledge of its pathophysiology is limited. To date, structural neuroimaging studies have typically been underpowered and have produced heterogenous findings. Mega-analyses combine individual raw participant data from multiple studies, substantially increasing statistical power and the ability to probe the complex pathophysiology of FND. <h3>Methods</h3> In this FND Society Neuroimaging Committee initiative, international research groups with magnetic resonance imaging data of functional motor or seizure patients and healthy controls were invited to send T1-weighted images (pre-processed or unprocessed) and associated clinical variables. Key morphometric features such as cortical thickness, cortical surface area, and subcortical volumes were extracted using the Destrieux cortical atlas (Freesurfer 6.0.0) and harmonised to account for multi-centre variance with an empirical Bayesian approach (ComBat). Following ANOVAs corrected for multiple comparisons, cohorts were compared with MANCOVAs adjusted for age, sex, and total intracranial volume. <h3>Results</h3> Fifteen groups contributed. The final dataset consisted of 564 age- and sex-matched controls and 493 patients, some of whom had both symptom subtypes (overall 314 motor symptoms, 193 seizures). Mean age 38.1 years for FND; 75.5% female. The FND cohort showed reduced cortical thickness in regions including the bilateral paracentral gyri and sulci, bilateral superior precentral sulci, and bilateral superior frontal sulci; varying fontal, occipital, and temporal regions showed reduced cortical surface area; volumes were reduced in regions including the bilateral putamen and hippocampi. In every case, the differences were small (η<sub>p</sub><sup>2</sup> &lt;0.016). Significant regions survived a manual leave-one-out analysis. The motor FND subtype contributed most to the differences. Binarised clinical variables were available for ~60% patients. Some of the reduced cortical thicknesses, particularly in the superior frontal and precentral regions, were associated with a history of depression. None of the differences were associated with history of anxiety, antidepressant use, or illness duration (years). <h3>Discussion</h3> This international collaboration mega-analysis represents the largest structural imaging study in FND to date. Results suggest FND is associated with small reductions in cortical thickness, surface area, and volumes, particularly in frontal, motor, and subcortical regions. Future research should investigate whether findings are of aetiological significance or are secondary to the condition, and whether they are specific to FND or are also seen in related disorders. Further granular analysis, for example via receptor density mapping, could further elucidate the pathophysiology of this disabling disorder. Consensus regarding the minimum clinical variables to collect in future FND research is required.

University Medical Center Groningen (NL), University of California, Los Angeles (US), King's College London (GB), Charles University (CZ), Masaryk University (CZ), University Hospital of Bern (CH), University Medical Center (US), Lúrio University (MZ), University of Alabama at Birmingham (US), Maastricht University (NL), University of Belgrade (RS), Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale degli Spedali Civili di Brescia (IT), National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry (JP), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (US), Neurological Surgery (US), Ruhr University Bochum (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.