The “logic” of diagrams in the <i>Spherics</i> of Theodosios

This paper provides a semiotic reading of the relationship between the text and the diagram in Theodosios’ Spherics , focusing on Sph. II.4 and II.5. This analysis provides a detailed explanation of what the inferences in the text imply for the mathematical objects and for the diagram, and argues that these are independent. It argues that the objects, and in particular the letters that name them, function in semiotically different ways in the text and in the diagram, but that the role of the objects in the text is meant to be mathematically and logically prior. It then argues that many places in which the diagram seems to contain information that is not included in the text are best explained by errors of the editing process or of the transmission; but that there do remain a few places that require direct inferences from the diagram.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal for the History of Astronomy
Published
2025-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00218286241248638
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Historical and Literary Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
11.35
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The “logic” of diagrams in the Spherics of Theodosios

Nathan Sidoli
1 citations
Journal for the History of Astronomy
Historical and Literary Studies
11.35
article

The “logic” of diagrams in the Spherics of Theodosios

Nathan Sidoli
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This paper provides a semiotic reading of the relationship between the text and the diagram in Theodosios’ Spherics , focusing on Sph. II.4 and II.5. This analysis provides a detailed explanation of what the inferences in the text imply for the mathematical objects and for the diagram, and argues that these are independent. It argues that the objects, and in particular the letters that name them, function in semiotically different ways in the text and in the diagram, but that the role of the objects in the text is meant to be mathematically and logically prior. It then argues that many places in which the diagram seems to contain information that is not included in the text are best explained by errors of the editing process or of the transmission; but that there do remain a few places that require direct inferences from the diagram.

Journal for the History of AstronomyVol. 56(1)
Waseda University (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Historical and Literary Studies
11.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.