Does Administrative Burden Influence Support for a Low-Income Child Care Supplement? Evidence from a Survey Experiment

Abstract The Canada-wide Early Learning and Child Care Plan promises to help low-income parents, especially women, participate in the economy. But even under this plan, care will be too expensive for many families. Several provinces offer targeted subsidies to reduce fees—unfortunately, these benefits are often hard to access and their popularity with voters is unclear. Using a pre-registered survey experiment (N=821), this research note investigates support for a hypothetical child care supplement to help low-income families. Overall, we find strong support for such an initiative, but little enthusiasm to pay for it through new income taxes. We then manipulate the ease of accessing this benefit. We find little evidence that burdensome child care benefits are more popular than easily accessible benefits. If anything, burdensome benefits reduce support. We then briefly consider how partisanship influences support. We conclude with timely recommendations for government and discuss the need for accessible child care benefits.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Canadian Journal of Political Science
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0008423924000350
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Healthcare Policy and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.26
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Does Administrative Burden Influence Support for a Low-Income Child Care Supplement? Evidence from a Survey Experiment

Yang Yang, Vincent C. Hopkins
2 citations
Canadian Journal of Political Science
Healthcare Policy and Management
2.26
article

Does Administrative Burden Influence Support for a Low-Income Child Care Supplement? Evidence from a Survey Experiment

Yang Yang, Vincent C. Hopkins
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract The Canada-wide Early Learning and Child Care Plan promises to help low-income parents, especially women, participate in the economy. But even under this plan, care will be too expensive for many families. Several provinces offer targeted subsidies to reduce fees—unfortunately, these benefits are often hard to access and their popularity with voters is unclear. Using a pre-registered survey experiment (N=821), this research note investigates support for a hypothetical child care supplement to help low-income families. Overall, we find strong support for such an initiative, but little enthusiasm to pay for it through new income taxes. We then manipulate the ease of accessing this benefit. We find little evidence that burdensome child care benefits are more popular than easily accessible benefits. If anything, burdensome benefits reduce support. We then briefly consider how partisanship influences support. We conclude with timely recommendations for government and discuss the need for accessible child care benefits.

Canadian Journal of Political ScienceVol. 57(4)
University of British Columbia (CA), University of Saskatchewan (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Healthcare Policy and Management
2.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Does Administrative Burden Influence Support for a Low-Income Child Care Supplement? Evidence from a Survey Experiment — Yang Yang, Vincent C. Hopkins · Canadian Journal of Political Science (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS