Molecular Dynamics (MD)-Derived Features for Canonical and Noncanonical Amino Acids

Machine learning (ML) models have become increasingly popular for predicting and designing structures and properties of peptides and proteins. These ML models typically use peptides and proteins containing only canonical amino acids as the training data. Consequently, these models struggle to make accurate predictions for peptides and proteins containing new amino acids that are absent in the training data set (<i>e.g.</i>, noncanonical amino acids). One approach to improve the accuracy of the models is to collect more training data with the desired amino acids. However, this strategy is suboptimal as new data may not be easily attainable, and additional time is required to retrain the ML models. Alternatively, the extendibility of the ML models can be improved if the amino acid features used are representative and generalizable to the unseen amino acids. Herein, we develop amino acid features using molecular dynamics (MD) simulation results. Specifically, for a given amino acid, we perform MD simulation of its dipeptide to create features based on its backbone (ϕ, ψ) distributions and its electrostatic potentials. We demonstrate that these new features enable our ML models to more accurately predict the structural ensembles of cyclic peptides containing amino acids not present in the original training data set. For example, we build ML models to predict cyclic pentapeptide structures, with the training data set containing a library of 15 amino acids and the test data set containing the same 15-amino-acid library or an extended 50-amino-acid library. When using popular features such as Morgan fingerprints and MACCS keys to represent amino acids, the ML models achieve <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.963 for structural predictions of test cyclic pentapeptides containing the same 15-amino-acid library. However, these models' performances decrease significantly to <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.430 and <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.508, respectively, when tasked to predict the structures of cyclic pentapeptides containing a library of 50 amino acids. On the other hand, the model using our backbone (ϕ, ψ) features outperforms those using Morgan fingerprints and MACCS keys, with <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.700. Overall, instead of having to collect more training data, our new features enable predictions of peptide sequences containing amino acids not originally present in the training data set at the mere cost of performing new dipeptide simulations for the new amino acids.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
Published
2025-02-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.4c02102
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Protein Structure and Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.64

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Molecular Dynamics (MD)-Derived Features for Canonical and Noncanonical Amino Acids

Tiffani Hui, Yu‐Shan Lin, Maxim Secor, Minh Ngoc Ho et al.
7 citations
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
Protein Structure and Dynamics
5.64
article

Molecular Dynamics (MD)-Derived Features for Canonical and Noncanonical Amino Acids

Tiffani Hui, Yu‐Shan Lin, Maxim Secor, Minh Ngoc Ho, Nomindari Bayaraa
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Machine learning (ML) models have become increasingly popular for predicting and designing structures and properties of peptides and proteins. These ML models typically use peptides and proteins containing only canonical amino acids as the training data. Consequently, these models struggle to make accurate predictions for peptides and proteins containing new amino acids that are absent in the training data set (<i>e.g.</i>, noncanonical amino acids). One approach to improve the accuracy of the models is to collect more training data with the desired amino acids. However, this strategy is suboptimal as new data may not be easily attainable, and additional time is required to retrain the ML models. Alternatively, the extendibility of the ML models can be improved if the amino acid features used are representative and generalizable to the unseen amino acids. Herein, we develop amino acid features using molecular dynamics (MD) simulation results. Specifically, for a given amino acid, we perform MD simulation of its dipeptide to create features based on its backbone (ϕ, ψ) distributions and its electrostatic potentials. We demonstrate that these new features enable our ML models to more accurately predict the structural ensembles of cyclic peptides containing amino acids not present in the original training data set. For example, we build ML models to predict cyclic pentapeptide structures, with the training data set containing a library of 15 amino acids and the test data set containing the same 15-amino-acid library or an extended 50-amino-acid library. When using popular features such as Morgan fingerprints and MACCS keys to represent amino acids, the ML models achieve <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.963 for structural predictions of test cyclic pentapeptides containing the same 15-amino-acid library. However, these models' performances decrease significantly to <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.430 and <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.508, respectively, when tasked to predict the structures of cyclic pentapeptides containing a library of 50 amino acids. On the other hand, the model using our backbone (ϕ, ψ) features outperforms those using Morgan fingerprints and MACCS keys, with <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.700. Overall, instead of having to collect more training data, our new features enable predictions of peptide sequences containing amino acids not originally present in the training data set at the mere cost of performing new dipeptide simulations for the new amino acids.

Journal of Chemical Information and ModelingVol. 65(4)
Tufts University (US)
National Institutes of Health, University of California, San Francisco, National Institute of General Medical Sciences
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Protein Structure and Dynamics
5.64
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.