Success and its discontents: independent living and the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities

This article highlights a paradox. On the one hand, the Independent Living (IL) movement has achieved a resounding success through the widespread ratification of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD). Yet on the other hand, the mainstreaming of the CRPD has witnessed proliferating misappropriations of IL. This has forced IL activists to fight on two fronts, continuing the older fight for implementing IL policies, while also engaging in a newer fight against misinterpretations of IL. Two recent examples of this newer epistemic struggle are discussed, drawing on the work of the European Network on Independent Living – fighting against representations of continuing institutionalisation as ‘community inclusion’, and fighting against representations of home care as ‘personal assistance’. The analysis concludes with an appeal to power holders to take the knowledge of IL activists seriously to help realise IL, while enabling epistemic justice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Disability & Society
Published
2025-02-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2025.2458002
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Healthcare innovation and challenges
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
17.85
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Success and its discontents: independent living and the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities

Teodor Mladenov
2 citations
Disability & Society
Healthcare innovation and challenges
17.85
article

Success and its discontents: independent living and the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities

Teodor Mladenov
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This article highlights a paradox. On the one hand, the Independent Living (IL) movement has achieved a resounding success through the widespread ratification of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD). Yet on the other hand, the mainstreaming of the CRPD has witnessed proliferating misappropriations of IL. This has forced IL activists to fight on two fronts, continuing the older fight for implementing IL policies, while also engaging in a newer fight against misinterpretations of IL. Two recent examples of this newer epistemic struggle are discussed, drawing on the work of the European Network on Independent Living – fighting against representations of continuing institutionalisation as ‘community inclusion’, and fighting against representations of home care as ‘personal assistance’. The analysis concludes with an appeal to power holders to take the knowledge of IL activists seriously to help realise IL, while enabling epistemic justice.

Disability & SocietyVol. 40(11)
University of Dundee (GB)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Healthcare innovation and challenges
17.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Success and its discontents: independent living and the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities — Teodor Mladenov · Disability & Society (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS