Tracing the History and Evolution of Dark Patterns on Twitter from 2010-2021

Designers’ use of deceptive and manipulative design practices have become increasingly ubiquitous, impacting users’ ability to make choices that respect their agency and autonomy. These practices have been popularly defined through the term dark patterns , which has gained attention from designers, privacy scholars, and, more recently, legal scholars and regulators. The increased interest in the concept of dark patterns across a range of practitioners and users motivated us to study the evolution of the concept and highlight the future trajectory of conversations around dark patterns and similar activist movements that utilize social computing platforms. In this article, we examine the history and evolution of the Twitter (currently known as X) discourse around #darkpatterns from its inception in June 2010 until April 2021, using a combination of quantitative and qualitative methods to describe how this discourse has changed over time. We frame these conversations through a new concept of socio-technical activism , whereby participants unite to identify and fight back against problematic technology and design practices. We discuss the potential future trajectories of this discourse and opportunities for further social computing scholarship at the intersection of design, policy, and online activism.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACM Transactions on Social Computing
Published
2025-02-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3716306
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Misinformation and Its Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Tracing the History and Evolution of Dark Patterns on Twitter from 2010-2021

Colin M. Gray, Matthew Will, Shruthi Sai Chivukula, Thomas Carlock et al.
1 citations
ACM Transactions on Social Computing
Misinformation and Its Impacts
4.20
article

Tracing the History and Evolution of Dark Patterns on Twitter from 2010-2021

Colin M. Gray, Matthew Will, Shruthi Sai Chivukula, Thomas Carlock, Ja-Naé Duane, Janna Johns, Ike Obi, Ziqing Li
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Designers’ use of deceptive and manipulative design practices have become increasingly ubiquitous, impacting users’ ability to make choices that respect their agency and autonomy. These practices have been popularly defined through the term dark patterns , which has gained attention from designers, privacy scholars, and, more recently, legal scholars and regulators. The increased interest in the concept of dark patterns across a range of practitioners and users motivated us to study the evolution of the concept and highlight the future trajectory of conversations around dark patterns and similar activist movements that utilize social computing platforms. In this article, we examine the history and evolution of the Twitter (currently known as X) discourse around #darkpatterns from its inception in June 2010 until April 2021, using a combination of quantitative and qualitative methods to describe how this discourse has changed over time. We frame these conversations through a new concept of socio-technical activism , whereby participants unite to identify and fight back against problematic technology and design practices. We discuss the potential future trajectories of this discourse and opportunities for further social computing scholarship at the intersection of design, policy, and online activism.

ACM Transactions on Social ComputingVol. 8(3-4)
Purdue University West Lafayette (US), Brown University (US), Indiana University Bloomington (US), Pratt Institute (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Misinformation and Its Impacts
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.