Improved efficiency of callus induction, bud differentiation, and plant regeneration in radish ( <i>Raphanus sativus</i> L.)
ABSTRACT Radish ( Raphanus sativus L.) is a recalcitrant variety for embryogenic callus induction that does not result in an efficient genetic transformation system. In this study, a highly efficient system for callus induction and bud differentiation in radish was established using orthogonal design tests with combinations of several synthetic auxins and cytokinins. Thirteen types of explants were tested; among them, cotyledon had the highest callus induction rate (91.01%) and was the most suitable explant. The optimal medium for callus induction was improved Murashige and Skoog medium (MS‐1) supplemented with 0.2 mg/L 2,4‐dichlorophenoxyacetic acid, 0.2 mg/L α ‐naphthalene acetic acid, 0.5 mg/L thidiazuron (TDZ), 4 mg/L 6‐benzylaminopurine (BA), 0.1 mg/L kinetin, with a callus induction rate of 94.77%. The optimal medium for shoot regeneration was MS‐1 medium supplemented with 1 mg/L TDZ, 1 mg/L BA, with a bud regeneration rate of 15.54%. The most suitable medium of rooting was 1/2 MS‐1 medium supplemented with 0.2 mg/L NAA, 0.2 mg/L 3‐indolebutyric acid, and 0.1% activated carbon, achieving a rooting ratio of 89.05% and transplant survival rate of 94.92%. This study lays a good foundation for future breeding and molecular studies on radishes.
Authors
- Changman Li (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0068-2270)
- Fabo Chen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4693-2650)
- Chuanyi Wang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7146-115X)
- Yi Liu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4641-7904)
- Ping Fang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3337-5752)
Institutions
- Yangtze Normal University (CN)
- Chongqing Three Gorges University (CN)
Publication Details
- Journal
- New Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science
- Published
- 2025-02-03
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1080/01140671.2024.2445813
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Plant tissue culture and regeneration
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.81