The Role of Instructional Design in the Delivery of Early Science Instruction

A critical tenet of education research is establishing what works. Another is exploring theorized mechanisms of change to help ascertain why academic programs work, for whom, and under which conditions. In other words, unpacking the black boxes of academic programs. This study explored the quality of teachers’ facilitation of (a) scientific investigations and (b) science discourse during and after the implementation of a systematic, explicit second-grade science program (Scientific Explorers-2). Our results demonstrated that relative to comparison classrooms, Scientific Explorers-2 classrooms delivered significantly higher quality scientific investigations. The quality of science discourse and maintenance effects for both measures were not statistically significant, but favored treatment classrooms in each case. Implications for designing science programs that support the delivery of high-quality science instruction that meets the needs of all students, particularly students with or at risk of learning disabilities, are discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Remedial and Special Education
Published
2025-02-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/07419325251314119
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Educational Research and Pedagogy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.49
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Role of Instructional Design in the Delivery of Early Science Instruction

Steven A. Maddox, Anna‐Mária Fall, William J. Therrien, Christian T. Doabler et al.
1 citations
Remedial and Special Education
Educational Research and Pedagogy
1.49
article

The Role of Instructional Design in the Delivery of Early Science Instruction

Steven A. Maddox, Anna‐Mária Fall, William J. Therrien, Christian T. Doabler, Jenna Gersib, Greg J. Roberts, Maria A. Longhi, Shadi Ghafghazi, Jason B. Phelps
article en
1 citations

Abstract

A critical tenet of education research is establishing what works. Another is exploring theorized mechanisms of change to help ascertain why academic programs work, for whom, and under which conditions. In other words, unpacking the black boxes of academic programs. This study explored the quality of teachers’ facilitation of (a) scientific investigations and (b) science discourse during and after the implementation of a systematic, explicit second-grade science program (Scientific Explorers-2). Our results demonstrated that relative to comparison classrooms, Scientific Explorers-2 classrooms delivered significantly higher quality scientific investigations. The quality of science discourse and maintenance effects for both measures were not statistically significant, but favored treatment classrooms in each case. Implications for designing science programs that support the delivery of high-quality science instruction that meets the needs of all students, particularly students with or at risk of learning disabilities, are discussed.

Remedial and Special Education
University of Virginia (US), Texas A&M University – Central Texas (US), The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Educational Research and Pedagogy
1.49
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.