Postcards from Italy – The Art of Controlling Images of Cultural Goods Better Than Copyright Could

Abstract Italian provisions on images of cultural goods may be reminiscent of copyright, in particular because they allow production and uses of such reproductions upon an authorisation, they impose fees for creating or exploiting them, and point out to the notion of integrity. However, the two sets of rules remain independent and autonomous, with a different purpose, subject matter and constitutional ground. National provisions are designed and interpreted in such a way that their outreach is broader than copyright. Therefore, they introduce a para- or quasi-copyright system, i.e. rules that are not necessarily accountable to third parties, affecting in this way the producers, users and reusers of potential images, as well as the material that is supposed to stay in the public domain. This is the main reason why it is crucial to study their legitimacy. This work studies Arts. 106–108 of the Italian Code on Cultural Goods and Landscape (ICCGL) limiting the ability to reproduce cultural goods, including when they embed a work of art, and this even when the latter is in the public domain. It explains why these written rules, based on a public property paradigm, may be criticized in a political and economic perspective, but are still compliant with higher norms, including EU rules on copyright and open data. In addition to that, the paper analyses the case law related to these provisions, it focuses in particular on the personality right on cultural good emerged in recent cases, and it explains why this prerogative raises concerns as to its consistency and compliance with higher norms. Finally, the article explains why a potential extraterritorial outreach of the provisions on images of cultural goods, as stated by an Italian Court, has to be challenged in different perspectives. It also clarifies costs and benefits of this solution, concluding on the operational implications on market operators and on the principle of non-discrimination.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
GRURRR. Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht, Rechtsprechungs-Report/GRUR-DVD/GRUR-CD/IIC/Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht/Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht. Internationaler Teil
Published
2025-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-025-01565-w
Primary Topic
Art History and Market Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Postcards from Italy – The Art of Controlling Images of Cultural Goods Better Than Copyright Could

Ludovico Bossi, Cristiana Sappa
GRURRR. Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht, Rechtsprechungs-Report/GRUR-DVD/GRUR-CD/IIC/Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht/Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht. Internationaler Teil
Art History and Market Analysis
article

Postcards from Italy – The Art of Controlling Images of Cultural Goods Better Than Copyright Could

Ludovico Bossi, Cristiana Sappa
article en

Abstract

Abstract Italian provisions on images of cultural goods may be reminiscent of copyright, in particular because they allow production and uses of such reproductions upon an authorisation, they impose fees for creating or exploiting them, and point out to the notion of integrity. However, the two sets of rules remain independent and autonomous, with a different purpose, subject matter and constitutional ground. National provisions are designed and interpreted in such a way that their outreach is broader than copyright. Therefore, they introduce a para- or quasi-copyright system, i.e. rules that are not necessarily accountable to third parties, affecting in this way the producers, users and reusers of potential images, as well as the material that is supposed to stay in the public domain. This is the main reason why it is crucial to study their legitimacy. This work studies Arts. 106–108 of the Italian Code on Cultural Goods and Landscape (ICCGL) limiting the ability to reproduce cultural goods, including when they embed a work of art, and this even when the latter is in the public domain. It explains why these written rules, based on a public property paradigm, may be criticized in a political and economic perspective, but are still compliant with higher norms, including EU rules on copyright and open data. In addition to that, the paper analyses the case law related to these provisions, it focuses in particular on the personality right on cultural good emerged in recent cases, and it explains why this prerogative raises concerns as to its consistency and compliance with higher norms. Finally, the article explains why a potential extraterritorial outreach of the provisions on images of cultural goods, as stated by an Italian Court, has to be challenged in different perspectives. It also clarifies costs and benefits of this solution, concluding on the operational implications on market operators and on the principle of non-discrimination.

GRURRR. Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht, Rechtsprechungs-Report/GRUR-DVD/GRUR-CD/IIC/Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht/Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht. Internationaler TeilVol. 56(2)
Institut d'Economie Scientifique Et de Gestion (FR), Libera Università Internazionale degli Studi Sociali Guido Carli (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Art History and Market Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.