Between Legitimacy and Cost: Freedom of Association and Collective Bargaining Rights in Global Supply Chains

Scholars and practitioners have advocated for freedom of association and collective bargaining (FOA/CB) rights as a key mechanism to improve labor compliance in global supply chains. Drawing on a longitudinal data set comprising 6,500 Better Work factory assessments across seven countries from 2015 to 2021, the authors compare violations of various FOA/CB elements to provide a general picture of the progress and problems of FOA/CB in supplier workplaces. They argue that suppliers are likely to selectively comply with FOA/CB elements that afford them some legitimacy but will violate the elements that impose significant costs on them. Specifically, the authors find fewer violations of union formation rights, in contrast to higher violations of union operation rights and of collective bargaining rights. Yet, when these latter rights are respected, they are associated with better compliance with other employment standards, with effective collective bargaining having the strongest effect.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Industrial and Labor Relations Review
Published
2025-02-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00197939251314867
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Global trade, sustainability, and social impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.45
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Between Legitimacy and Cost: Freedom of Association and Collective Bargaining Rights in Global Supply Chains

Chunyun Li, Jinsun Bae, Sarosh Kuruvilla
2 citations
Industrial and Labor Relations Review
Global trade, sustainability, and social impact
4.45
article

Between Legitimacy and Cost: Freedom of Association and Collective Bargaining Rights in Global Supply Chains

Chunyun Li, Jinsun Bae, Sarosh Kuruvilla
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Scholars and practitioners have advocated for freedom of association and collective bargaining (FOA/CB) rights as a key mechanism to improve labor compliance in global supply chains. Drawing on a longitudinal data set comprising 6,500 Better Work factory assessments across seven countries from 2015 to 2021, the authors compare violations of various FOA/CB elements to provide a general picture of the progress and problems of FOA/CB in supplier workplaces. They argue that suppliers are likely to selectively comply with FOA/CB elements that afford them some legitimacy but will violate the elements that impose significant costs on them. Specifically, the authors find fewer violations of union formation rights, in contrast to higher violations of union operation rights and of collective bargaining rights. Yet, when these latter rights are respected, they are associated with better compliance with other employment standards, with effective collective bargaining having the strongest effect.

Industrial and Labor Relations ReviewVol. 78(3)
Cornell University (US), Carleton University (CA), London School of Economics and Political Science (GB)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Global trade, sustainability, and social impact
4.45
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Between Legitimacy and Cost: Freedom of Association and Collective Bargaining Rights in Global Supply Chains — Chunyun Li, Jinsun Bae, et al. · Industrial and Labor Relations Review (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS