Hard to Borrow vs. Easy to Borrow: Insights from Japan’s Centralized Lendable Stock Market

This study examines stock borrowing costs in Japan’s centralized lendable stock market, focusing on differences between ‘hard-to-borrow’ and ‘easy-to-borrow’ stocks over six months of daily data. This study employs a comprehensive methodology to examine metrics such as the short interest ratio, borrowing costs, institutional ownership, price-to-book value ratio, and new stock borrowing patterns. Regression models are utilized to explore the relationships between these factors and borrowing costs. The findings reveal that ‘hard-to-borrow’ stocks are associated with higher short interest ratios, borrowing costs, price-to-book ratios, and turnover but exhibit lower institutional ownership compared to ‘easy-to-borrow’ stocks. Notably, institutional ownership negatively correlates with borrowing costs across both categories, while the short interest ratio positively correlates with borrowing costs only for ‘hard-to-borrow’ stocks. Contrary to expectations, ‘hard-to-borrow’ stocks do not underperform despite elevated borrowing expenses, suggesting that these costs do not deter short selling activities in the Japanese market. The findings of this study offer key implications for investors and regulators. For investors, understanding the factors influencing borrowing costs aids in optimizing short-selling strategies. For regulators, the results highlight the role of centralized lendable stock markets in enhancing pricing efficiency without hindering trading activities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Financial Studies
Published
2025-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijfs13010016
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.42
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hard to Borrow vs. Easy to Borrow: Insights from Japan’s Centralized Lendable Stock Market

Mostafa Saidur Rahim Khan
2 citations
International Journal of Financial Studies
Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
4.42
article

Hard to Borrow vs. Easy to Borrow: Insights from Japan’s Centralized Lendable Stock Market

Mostafa Saidur Rahim Khan
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This study examines stock borrowing costs in Japan’s centralized lendable stock market, focusing on differences between ‘hard-to-borrow’ and ‘easy-to-borrow’ stocks over six months of daily data. This study employs a comprehensive methodology to examine metrics such as the short interest ratio, borrowing costs, institutional ownership, price-to-book value ratio, and new stock borrowing patterns. Regression models are utilized to explore the relationships between these factors and borrowing costs. The findings reveal that ‘hard-to-borrow’ stocks are associated with higher short interest ratios, borrowing costs, price-to-book ratios, and turnover but exhibit lower institutional ownership compared to ‘easy-to-borrow’ stocks. Notably, institutional ownership negatively correlates with borrowing costs across both categories, while the short interest ratio positively correlates with borrowing costs only for ‘hard-to-borrow’ stocks. Contrary to expectations, ‘hard-to-borrow’ stocks do not underperform despite elevated borrowing expenses, suggesting that these costs do not deter short selling activities in the Japanese market. The findings of this study offer key implications for investors and regulators. For investors, understanding the factors influencing borrowing costs aids in optimizing short-selling strategies. For regulators, the results highlight the role of centralized lendable stock markets in enhancing pricing efficiency without hindering trading activities.

International Journal of Financial StudiesVol. 13(1)
Hiroshima University of Economics (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
4.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.