Effect of three cooking methods on cooking loss and edible weight of rabbit meat

Introduction: Mediterranean diet features gastronomic heritage that includes rabbit dishes. Some food composition tables present scant information regarding the yield and edible parts of rabbit meat. Objectives: This study seeks to investigate how various cooking techniques impact the cooking loss and edible weight of different cuts of rabbit meat. Methodology: Six male rabbits were slaughtered and the carcasses were dissected: hind leg, ribs, belly, saddle loin, saddle hindquarter and front leg were analysed in duplicated (n=12). Cooking methods included boiling, oven-roasting, and frying until the internal temperature reached 75°C. Post-cooking, samples were cooled, deboned, and weighed to determine edible weight percentage and cooking loss. Results: Frying method was the quickest (from 4.8 to 13.6 minutes), while boiling method was the slowest (from 26.9 to 33.9 minutes). After cooking, the average edible weight was higher in saddle hindquarter (86.7; SD 12.4 g) and saddle loin (52.7; SD 10.1 g) and lower in hind leg (17.8; SD 2.8 g) and belly (13.5; SD 4.6 g). The boiling method presented lower cooking losses (28.2; SD 6.4%) and higher edible weight (51.7; SD 7.6%), and frying the higher cooking loss (36.0; SD 10.0%) and lower edible weight (47.0; SD 8.3%). Conclusions: Boiling demonstrated superior performance despite longer cooking times, while frying showed the least favourable outcomes. This study offers valuable insights for gastrotechnics and culinary management.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Acta Portuguesa de Nutrição
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21011/apn.2024.3907
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Rabbits: Nutrition, Reproduction, Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.02

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effect of three cooking methods on cooking loss and edible weight of rabbit meat

Marta Silva, Carla Gonçalves, Pedro Nunes, Divanildo Outor‐Monteiro et al.
3 citations
Acta Portuguesa de Nutrição
Rabbits: Nutrition, Reproduction, Health
1.02
article

Effect of three cooking methods on cooking loss and edible weight of rabbit meat

Marta Silva, Carla Gonçalves, Pedro Nunes, Divanildo Outor‐Monteiro, Tânia Silva-Santos, L.M.M. Ferreira, Inês Santos, Víctor Pinheiro, José Teixeira
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Introduction: Mediterranean diet features gastronomic heritage that includes rabbit dishes. Some food composition tables present scant information regarding the yield and edible parts of rabbit meat. Objectives: This study seeks to investigate how various cooking techniques impact the cooking loss and edible weight of different cuts of rabbit meat. Methodology: Six male rabbits were slaughtered and the carcasses were dissected: hind leg, ribs, belly, saddle loin, saddle hindquarter and front leg were analysed in duplicated (n=12). Cooking methods included boiling, oven-roasting, and frying until the internal temperature reached 75°C. Post-cooking, samples were cooled, deboned, and weighed to determine edible weight percentage and cooking loss. Results: Frying method was the quickest (from 4.8 to 13.6 minutes), while boiling method was the slowest (from 26.9 to 33.9 minutes). After cooking, the average edible weight was higher in saddle hindquarter (86.7; SD 12.4 g) and saddle loin (52.7; SD 10.1 g) and lower in hind leg (17.8; SD 2.8 g) and belly (13.5; SD 4.6 g). The boiling method presented lower cooking losses (28.2; SD 6.4%) and higher edible weight (51.7; SD 7.6%), and frying the higher cooking loss (36.0; SD 10.0%) and lower edible weight (47.0; SD 8.3%). Conclusions: Boiling demonstrated superior performance despite longer cooking times, while frying showed the least favourable outcomes. This study offers valuable insights for gastrotechnics and culinary management.

Acta Portuguesa de NutriçãoVol. 39
Universidade de Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro, Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, European Regional Development Fund
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Rabbits: Nutrition, Reproduction, Health
1.02
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.