Critical review of the daylight glare probability and proposal for modification for improved evaluation of small glare sources

EN 17037 defines essential properties of daylight in buildings: daylight provision, view out, sunlight exposure and glare protection. For assessing glare, the standard proposes the daylight glare probability (DGP) metric. A look at the formula reveals the following problem: since the luminance is included quadratically, but the solid angle only linearly, small but bright glare sources (e.g. the sun) are rated highly. This must be questioned if the glare stimulus can no longer be distinguished from larger stimuli causing equal vertical illuminance at the eye, especially in the peripheral visual field. For the unified glare rating for artificial lighting, this is avoided by limiting the minimum solid angle of the glare source. There is nothing comparable for the DGP. We present a simulation study on how the DGP changes with the bidirectional scattering distribution function resolution for complex fenestration systems or with rendering the sun at its real size. We performed subject experiments on the discriminability of small light stimuli in the periphery in a laboratory setup. Based on the findings, we propose adjusting the DGP by limiting the minimum glare source solid angle depending on its position in the field of view. We conclude with an evaluation of the simulation results with the modified metric daylight glare metric (DGM) and point out open issues that still need to be investigated.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Lighting Research & Technology
Published
2025-02-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/14771535251314413
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Impact of Light on Environment and Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.42
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Critical review of the daylight glare probability and proposal for modification for improved evaluation of small glare sources

Christian Knoflach, David Geisler‐Moroder
4 citations
Lighting Research & Technology
Impact of Light on Environment and Health
4.42
article

Critical review of the daylight glare probability and proposal for modification for improved evaluation of small glare sources

Christian Knoflach, David Geisler‐Moroder
article en
4 citations

Abstract

EN 17037 defines essential properties of daylight in buildings: daylight provision, view out, sunlight exposure and glare protection. For assessing glare, the standard proposes the daylight glare probability (DGP) metric. A look at the formula reveals the following problem: since the luminance is included quadratically, but the solid angle only linearly, small but bright glare sources (e.g. the sun) are rated highly. This must be questioned if the glare stimulus can no longer be distinguished from larger stimuli causing equal vertical illuminance at the eye, especially in the peripheral visual field. For the unified glare rating for artificial lighting, this is avoided by limiting the minimum solid angle of the glare source. There is nothing comparable for the DGP. We present a simulation study on how the DGP changes with the bidirectional scattering distribution function resolution for complex fenestration systems or with rendering the sun at its real size. We performed subject experiments on the discriminability of small light stimuli in the periphery in a laboratory setup. Based on the findings, we propose adjusting the DGP by limiting the minimum glare source solid angle depending on its position in the field of view. We conclude with an evaluation of the simulation results with the modified metric daylight glare metric (DGM) and point out open issues that still need to be investigated.

Lighting Research & TechnologyVol. 57(6-7)
Universität Innsbruck (AT), Bartenbach - The Lighting Innovators (Austria) (AT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Impact of Light on Environment and Health
4.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.