‘What happened to the un-omitted subjects?’

Abstract This research examines variations of subject expression in spoken Korean. While much focus has been put on the omission of subjects in Korean as a pro-drop language, what is less explored is under what conditions choices are made into different forms when subjects are expressed, which in Korean includes not only pronouns but also kinship terms, professional titles, personal names and other lexical forms. In this paper, I test the distribution of subject expression in spoken Korean corpora for first and second person subjects and analyse the discursive aspects of the referential choices for the expressed subjects. The results confirm that first and second person subjects are expressed with varied referential forms and that relative age between discourse participants becomes a significant factor in the referential choice. This study also remarks on the importance of socio-cultural and pragmatic interpretation in the discussion of subject expression in Korean.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pragmatics and Society
Published
2025-02-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.20022.lee
Primary Topic
Gender Studies in Language
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

‘What happened to the un-omitted subjects?’

Narah Lee
Pragmatics and Society
Gender Studies in Language
article

‘What happened to the un-omitted subjects?’

Narah Lee
article en

Abstract

Abstract This research examines variations of subject expression in spoken Korean. While much focus has been put on the omission of subjects in Korean as a pro-drop language, what is less explored is under what conditions choices are made into different forms when subjects are expressed, which in Korean includes not only pronouns but also kinship terms, professional titles, personal names and other lexical forms. In this paper, I test the distribution of subject expression in spoken Korean corpora for first and second person subjects and analyse the discursive aspects of the referential choices for the expressed subjects. The results confirm that first and second person subjects are expressed with varied referential forms and that relative age between discourse participants becomes a significant factor in the referential choice. This study also remarks on the importance of socio-cultural and pragmatic interpretation in the discussion of subject expression in Korean.

Pragmatics and SocietyVol. 16(6)
The University of Queensland (AU), University of Electro-Communications (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Gender Studies in Language
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

‘What happened to the un-omitted subjects?’ — Narah Lee · Pragmatics and Society (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS