Ninety years of alien plant species accumulation across regional and local scales in central European fields

Alien species are increasingly prevalent worldwide, leading to economic and biodiversity losses. We examined how the spread of non-crop alien plant species (i.e., archaeophytes and neophytes) has evolved in arable fields across ten countries in central Europe from 1930 to 2019. Specifically, we analyzed how regional and local trajectories of alien plant species have changed over the last ninety years. We used a dataset of 21,747 vegetation plots from the AgriWeedClim database and applied generalized linear mixed-effect models. We analyzed the percentage of plots containing neophytes to characterize regional scale dynamics, as well as the proportional number and relative abundance of alien species per plot, offering insights into the local scale dynamics of alien species spread in arable fields. The dynamics of species populations in the study area revealed significant contrasts between neophytes and archaeophytes over time. The percentage of plots containing neophytes strongly increased from 34.2 % in 1930 to 70.1 % in 2019. The proportion of neophytes, in plots nearly doubled from 5.5 % in 1930 to 10.2 % in 2019. The relative abundance, meaning their biomass relative to the total biomass of all species in the plot, of neophytes followed a similar upward trend increasing from 4.1 % to 9.9 %. This highlights not only the spatial spread of neophytes in arable vegetation but also their increasing cover on the local scale. Archaeophyte species displayed a different trajectory. Their proportion exhibited only a modest increase from 23.2 % to 25.3 % over the ninety-year period, while their relative abundance slightly decreased from 21.2 % to 19.5 %. A sensitivity analysis of our data further revealed that the temporal increase in the percentage of plots containing neophytes is mainly driven by a few common species, such as Veronica persica and Erigeron annuus , which had a high number of records during the study period. We anticipate an increasing occurrence of neophytes in local communities in the future, which may contribute to the homogenization of regional arable plant communities. • Alien plant species spread across regional and local scales in arable fields. • Stable archaeophyte populations contrast with rising neophytes. • Neophyte plant species have doubled in arable fields since 1930. • Few common neophyte plant species drive the spread. • Native plant species decline as alien plants accumulate.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment
Published
2025-02-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2025.109483
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Botany and Plant Ecology Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.25
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ninety years of alien plant species accumulation across regional and local scales in central European fields

Franz Essl, Gilles Colling, Urban Šilc, Serge Buholzer et al.
3 citations
Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment
Botany and Plant Ecology Studies
5.25
article

Ninety years of alien plant species accumulation across regional and local scales in central European fields

Franz Essl, Gilles Colling, Urban Šilc, Serge Buholzer, Michael Glaser, Matthias Schumacher, Florian Jansen, Michaela Kolářová, Jana Bürger, Emanuele Fanfarillo, Zdeňka Lososová, Milan Chytrý, Stefan Dullinger, Filip Küzmič, Swen Follak, Alexander Wietzke
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Alien species are increasingly prevalent worldwide, leading to economic and biodiversity losses. We examined how the spread of non-crop alien plant species (i.e., archaeophytes and neophytes) has evolved in arable fields across ten countries in central Europe from 1930 to 2019. Specifically, we analyzed how regional and local trajectories of alien plant species have changed over the last ninety years. We used a dataset of 21,747 vegetation plots from the AgriWeedClim database and applied generalized linear mixed-effect models. We analyzed the percentage of plots containing neophytes to characterize regional scale dynamics, as well as the proportional number and relative abundance of alien species per plot, offering insights into the local scale dynamics of alien species spread in arable fields. The dynamics of species populations in the study area revealed significant contrasts between neophytes and archaeophytes over time. The percentage of plots containing neophytes strongly increased from 34.2 % in 1930 to 70.1 % in 2019. The proportion of neophytes, in plots nearly doubled from 5.5 % in 1930 to 10.2 % in 2019. The relative abundance, meaning their biomass relative to the total biomass of all species in the plot, of neophytes followed a similar upward trend increasing from 4.1 % to 9.9 %. This highlights not only the spatial spread of neophytes in arable vegetation but also their increasing cover on the local scale. Archaeophyte species displayed a different trajectory. Their proportion exhibited only a modest increase from 23.2 % to 25.3 % over the ninety-year period, while their relative abundance slightly decreased from 21.2 % to 19.5 %. A sensitivity analysis of our data further revealed that the temporal increase in the percentage of plots containing neophytes is mainly driven by a few common species, such as Veronica persica and Erigeron annuus , which had a high number of records during the study period. We anticipate an increasing occurrence of neophytes in local communities in the future, which may contribute to the homogenization of regional arable plant communities. • Alien plant species spread across regional and local scales in arable fields. • Stable archaeophyte populations contrast with rising neophytes. • Neophyte plant species have doubled in arable fields since 1930. • Few common neophyte plant species drive the spread. • Native plant species decline as alien plants accumulate.

Agriculture Ecosystems & EnvironmentVol. 383
Life in Land, Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Botany and Plant Ecology Studies
5.25
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.