Earthquake-based multi-hazard resilience assessment: a case study of Istanbul, Turkey (neighborhood level)
Abstract We developed a model integrating 28 criteria spanning social, economic, community, environmental, and physical dimensions to evaluate earthquake resilience of Istanbul, a city with a population of 16 million and significant seismic risk, at both district and subdistrict/neighborhood levels. The resilience assessment uses the Bayesian Best-Worst Method, a multi-criteria decision-making framework that combines expert knowledge and statistical assessments. The results reveal that Istanbul’s overall Resilience Score (RS) is 0.48, on a 0-1 scale, suggesting a moderate capacity to endure and recover from seismic events. Catalca, Adalar, and Arnavutkoy rank among the most resilient districts, whereas Esenler and Gungoren exhibit lower resilience. On a subdistrict level, Suleymaniye (Fatih) has the highest RS at 0.59, while Yavuz Sultan Selim (Fatih) ranks the lowest with 0.22. These findings provide actionable and practical data-driven insights for policymakers and urban planners, underscoring the need for targeted interventions to improve resilience in high-risk areas in Istanbul.
Authors
- Haluk Özener (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2531-3030)
- Himmet Karaman (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4923-3561)
- Maryna Batur (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9284-8858)
- Mahyat Shafapourtehrany
- Saman Ghaffarian (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9882-4603)
- Umut Lagap (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4498-1501)
- Rıza Evren Kılcı
Institutions
- Kandilli Observatory and Earthquake Research Institute (TR)
- Istanbul Metropolitan Municipality (TR)
- Systemic Risk Centre (GB)
- Boğaziçi University (TR)
- University College London (GB)
- Istanbul Technical University (TR)
Publication Details
- Journal
- npj natural hazards.
- Published
- 2025-02-03
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1038/s44304-025-00065-8
- Citations
- 11
- Primary Topic
- Disaster Management and Resilience
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 46.22