Technology license agreements as public–private partnerships for economic development: evaluations using surveys, input–output modeling, and regression analysis

Abstract We evaluate license agreements as a form of technology transfer that constitutes a public–private partnership (PPP) with the primary goal of economic development. These license agreements permit entrepreneurs and other businesses to turn government innovations into earnings. We constructed a complete database of all license agreements between the U.S. Department of Defense and private industry from 2000 to 2021. We first surveyed the companies involved, achieving a 96% response rate. The subsequently anonymized responses allowed us to generate sales numbers and to model a variety of other national economic impacts. We tallied approximately $32 billion in direct sales across 590 license agreements. While the majority of license agreements with sales belong to smaller companies (which often attract additional investment), some large companies generate higher revenues. Further statistical modeling with the heavily anonymized data identifies features of license agreement situations that influence economic outcomes. Technology license agreements are a form of PPP that performs well against its goal of economic development without the downsides of some PPPs. Importantly, entrepreneurs can use this form of PPP to attract investment and to generate jobs and other societal benefits.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship
Published
2025-02-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-025-00467-y
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Public-Private Partnership Projects
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.45

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Technology license agreements as public–private partnerships for economic development: evaluations using surveys, input–output modeling, and regression analysis

Eric K. Austin, Brian C. Lewandowski, Michael P. Wallner, Joe Hutton et al.
2 citations
Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship
Public-Private Partnership Projects
4.45
article

Technology license agreements as public–private partnerships for economic development: evaluations using surveys, input–output modeling, and regression analysis

Eric K. Austin, Brian C. Lewandowski, Michael P. Wallner, Joe Hutton, Eric D. Raile, Bridger Sellegren, Derek Kapps, Jeffrey A. Peterson
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract We evaluate license agreements as a form of technology transfer that constitutes a public–private partnership (PPP) with the primary goal of economic development. These license agreements permit entrepreneurs and other businesses to turn government innovations into earnings. We constructed a complete database of all license agreements between the U.S. Department of Defense and private industry from 2000 to 2021. We first surveyed the companies involved, achieving a 96% response rate. The subsequently anonymized responses allowed us to generate sales numbers and to model a variety of other national economic impacts. We tallied approximately $32 billion in direct sales across 590 license agreements. While the majority of license agreements with sales belong to smaller companies (which often attract additional investment), some large companies generate higher revenues. Further statistical modeling with the heavily anonymized data identifies features of license agreement situations that influence economic outcomes. Technology license agreements are a form of PPP that performs well against its goal of economic development without the downsides of some PPPs. Importantly, entrepreneurs can use this form of PPP to attract investment and to generate jobs and other societal benefits.

Journal of Innovation and EntrepreneurshipVol. 14(1)
University of Colorado Boulder (US), Montana State University (US)
U.S. Department of Defense, University of Colorado Boulder
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Public-Private Partnership Projects
4.45
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.