Accuracy of PVSyst Simulations in the Reproduction of the Yield Performance of Multicrystalline, Monocrsytalline and Monocasting Modules in Outdoor Conditions

In this study we performed field tests on three small installations consisting of 12 modules each and next to each other, all of them using exactly the same manufacturing technology for cells and modules and employing the same manufacturing equipment and raw materials. The only difference between the systems was the wafer technology used. Two of them were manufactured through the same casting technology (Direct solidification system-DSS) and the same equipment: in one of them we grew mc-Si and in the other one CM-Si (mono casting). In the third system we used traditional Czochralski monocrystalline wafers as technology. Two of the facilities (the DSS based ones) have been closely monitored for three years, and the traditional monocrystalline one for 17 months. For the three installations the performance data is shared and compared with PVsyst simulations and correlated well to each other.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SiliconPV Conference Proceedings
Published
2025-02-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.52825/siliconpv.v2i.1299
Primary Topic
Photovoltaic Systems and Sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Accuracy of PVSyst Simulations in the Reproduction of the Yield Performance of Multicrystalline, Monocrsytalline and Monocasting Modules in Outdoor Conditions

Ismael Guerrero, Carlos del Cañizo, Yuanjie Yu
SiliconPV Conference Proceedings
Photovoltaic Systems and Sustainability
article

Accuracy of PVSyst Simulations in the Reproduction of the Yield Performance of Multicrystalline, Monocrsytalline and Monocasting Modules in Outdoor Conditions

Ismael Guerrero, Carlos del Cañizo, Yuanjie Yu
article en

Abstract

In this study we performed field tests on three small installations consisting of 12 modules each and next to each other, all of them using exactly the same manufacturing technology for cells and modules and employing the same manufacturing equipment and raw materials. The only difference between the systems was the wafer technology used. Two of them were manufactured through the same casting technology (Direct solidification system-DSS) and the same equipment: in one of them we grew mc-Si and in the other one CM-Si (mono casting). In the third system we used traditional Czochralski monocrystalline wafers as technology. Two of the facilities (the DSS based ones) have been closely monitored for three years, and the traditional monocrystalline one for 17 months. For the three installations the performance data is shared and compared with PVsyst simulations and correlated well to each other.

SiliconPV Conference ProceedingsVol. 2
Beijing Solar Energy Research Institute (CN), Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (ES)
Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación
Openalex Percentile: Top 99%
Photovoltaic Systems and Sustainability
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Accuracy of PVSyst Simulations in the Reproduction of the Yield Performance of Multicrystalline, Monocrsytalline and Monocasting Modules in Outdoor Conditions — Ismael Guerrero, Carlos del Cañizo, et al. · SiliconPV Conference Proceedings (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS