Feasibility of remote robot empowered teleultrasound scanning for radioactive patients

To investigate the feasibility of robot-assisted teleultrasound diagnosis for radioactive patients compared with conventional ultrasound diagnosis. In this prospective study (ChineseClinicalTrials.gov identifier, ChiCTR2200057253), 32 radioactive patients were examined by conventional ultrasound and MGIUS-R3 robot-assisted ultrasound from March 2022 to June 2022. After two scans, patients completed a satisfaction survey, including comfort score, fear score, tension score and pain score. The durations of both scans were recorded, and sonographers wore lead apron to prevent the radiation during the conventional examination. Subsequently, the ultrasonic images saved by sonographers were diagnosed and scored. Finally, we evaluated the feasibility of the robot-assisted teleultrasound diagnosis system regarding patients' satisfaction, examination duration, image quality and diagnostic consistency via χ<sup>2</sup> test, Kappa consistency test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Among 32 patients (mean age, 54.9 ± 9.8 [SD]; 16 women), 29 had consistent diagnoses and 3 had inconsistent diagnoses between two scans, but the diagnostic consistency was good (Kappa = 0.818, P < 0.001). In addition, there was no statistical difference between two scans with regard to image quality score (29.28 ± 0.47vs29.31 ± 0.44, P = 0.97), comfort score (10vs10, P > 0.99), tension score (0vs0, P > 0.99) and fear score (0.09vs0, P = 0.32). Although 7 patients felt slightly painful during teleultrasound scan, the pain intensity was acceptable (0.31vs0, P = 0.02). The mean duration of teleultrasound examinations was 11.1 min (6-24 min), which was longer than 5.9 min (2-17 min) of conventional examinations (P < 0.001). Comparing robot-assisted teleultrasound and conventional ultrasound, there was no evidence of differences regarding patients' satisfaction and image quality, and the diagnostic consistency was remarkable.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-02-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-76441-7
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.52

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Feasibility of remote robot empowered teleultrasound scanning for radioactive patients

Man Lu, Zirui Jiang, Jia‐Mi Li, Lu Wang et al.
1 citations
Scientific Reports
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
1.52
article

Feasibility of remote robot empowered teleultrasound scanning for radioactive patients

Man Lu, Zirui Jiang, Jia‐Mi Li, Lu Wang, Ying Liang, Bo Yu, Manuel Escobar Amoresa
article en
1 citations

Abstract

To investigate the feasibility of robot-assisted teleultrasound diagnosis for radioactive patients compared with conventional ultrasound diagnosis. In this prospective study (ChineseClinicalTrials.gov identifier, ChiCTR2200057253), 32 radioactive patients were examined by conventional ultrasound and MGIUS-R3 robot-assisted ultrasound from March 2022 to June 2022. After two scans, patients completed a satisfaction survey, including comfort score, fear score, tension score and pain score. The durations of both scans were recorded, and sonographers wore lead apron to prevent the radiation during the conventional examination. Subsequently, the ultrasonic images saved by sonographers were diagnosed and scored. Finally, we evaluated the feasibility of the robot-assisted teleultrasound diagnosis system regarding patients' satisfaction, examination duration, image quality and diagnostic consistency via χ<sup>2</sup> test, Kappa consistency test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Among 32 patients (mean age, 54.9 ± 9.8 [SD]; 16 women), 29 had consistent diagnoses and 3 had inconsistent diagnoses between two scans, but the diagnostic consistency was good (Kappa = 0.818, P < 0.001). In addition, there was no statistical difference between two scans with regard to image quality score (29.28 ± 0.47vs29.31 ± 0.44, P = 0.97), comfort score (10vs10, P > 0.99), tension score (0vs0, P > 0.99) and fear score (0.09vs0, P = 0.32). Although 7 patients felt slightly painful during teleultrasound scan, the pain intensity was acceptable (0.31vs0, P = 0.02). The mean duration of teleultrasound examinations was 11.1 min (6-24 min), which was longer than 5.9 min (2-17 min) of conventional examinations (P < 0.001). Comparing robot-assisted teleultrasound and conventional ultrasound, there was no evidence of differences regarding patients' satisfaction and image quality, and the diagnostic consistency was remarkable.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
University of Nevada, Reno (US), University of Electronic Science and Technology of China (CN), Sichuan Cancer Hospital (CN), Vall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari (ES)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, National Key Research and Development Program of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
1.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.