Effect of Higher or Lower PEEP on Pendelluft During Spontaneous Breathing Efforts in Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure

<b>Background:</b> In acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF), spontaneous breathing effort can generate excessive regional lung stress and strain manifesting as pendelluft. Higher PEEP may reduce pendelluft and reduce regional lung stress and strain during spontaneous breathing. This study aimed to establish whether higher or lower PEEP ameliorates pendelluft and to characterize factors determining the presence and magnitude of pendelluft during spontaneous breathing efforts. <b>Methods:</b> This study was a randomized crossover trial of higher versus lower PEEP applied after systematically initiating spontaneous breathing in subjects with moderate or severe AHRF. The presence and volume of pendelluft were assessed by electrical impedance tomography (EIT). <b>Results:</b> EIT recordings were available for 20 of 30 subjects enrolled in the trial. After initiating spontaneous breathing, 11/20 exhibited pendelluft (proportion 55% [95% CI 32-76]). Following PEEP titration, the prevalence of pendelluft was not different between higher versus lower PEEP levels (50% vs 50%, <i>P</i> = .55). When present, pendelluft volume was generally small (median 28 [interquartile range 8-93] mL) but ranged as high as 364 mL. Pendelluft was associated with higher respiratory effort (esophageal pressure [P<sub>es</sub>] swing [ΔP<sub>es</sub>] median -15 cm H<sub>2</sub>O vs ΔP<sub>es</sub> median -8 cm H<sub>2</sub>O, <i>P</i> = .01), higher pulmonary flow resistance (median 8 cm H<sub>2</sub>O/L/s vs median 3 cm H<sub>2</sub>O/L/s, <i>P</i> < .001), and higher dynamic pulmonary elastance (median 5.0 cm H<sub>2</sub>O/mL/kg predicted body weight vs median 3.2 cm H<sub>2</sub>O/mL/kg predicted body weight, <i>P</i> = .03). <b>Conclusions:</b> Pendelluft reflecting increased regional lung stress and strain is likely common during spontaneous breathing effort in patients with AHRF but was not systematically affected by applying higher PEEP. The presence and magnitude of pendelluft depended on respiratory effort and lung mechanics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Respiratory Care
Published
2025-02-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1089/respcare.12193
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.59
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effect of Higher or Lower PEEP on Pendelluft During Spontaneous Breathing Efforts in Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure

José Dianti, Niall D. Ferguson, Zhanqi Zhao, Takeshi Yoshida et al.
5 citations
Respiratory Care
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
7.59
article

Effect of Higher or Lower PEEP on Pendelluft During Spontaneous Breathing Efforts in Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure

José Dianti, Niall D. Ferguson, Zhanqi Zhao, Takeshi Yoshida, Ewan C. Goligher, Arthur S. Slutsky, Catherine A. Bellissimo, Thiago Bassi, Laurent Brochard, Idunn S. Morris, Georgiana Roman-Sarita
article en
5 citations

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> In acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF), spontaneous breathing effort can generate excessive regional lung stress and strain manifesting as pendelluft. Higher PEEP may reduce pendelluft and reduce regional lung stress and strain during spontaneous breathing. This study aimed to establish whether higher or lower PEEP ameliorates pendelluft and to characterize factors determining the presence and magnitude of pendelluft during spontaneous breathing efforts. <b>Methods:</b> This study was a randomized crossover trial of higher versus lower PEEP applied after systematically initiating spontaneous breathing in subjects with moderate or severe AHRF. The presence and volume of pendelluft were assessed by electrical impedance tomography (EIT). <b>Results:</b> EIT recordings were available for 20 of 30 subjects enrolled in the trial. After initiating spontaneous breathing, 11/20 exhibited pendelluft (proportion 55% [95% CI 32-76]). Following PEEP titration, the prevalence of pendelluft was not different between higher versus lower PEEP levels (50% vs 50%, <i>P</i> = .55). When present, pendelluft volume was generally small (median 28 [interquartile range 8-93] mL) but ranged as high as 364 mL. Pendelluft was associated with higher respiratory effort (esophageal pressure [P<sub>es</sub>] swing [ΔP<sub>es</sub>] median -15 cm H<sub>2</sub>O vs ΔP<sub>es</sub> median -8 cm H<sub>2</sub>O, <i>P</i> = .01), higher pulmonary flow resistance (median 8 cm H<sub>2</sub>O/L/s vs median 3 cm H<sub>2</sub>O/L/s, <i>P</i> < .001), and higher dynamic pulmonary elastance (median 5.0 cm H<sub>2</sub>O/mL/kg predicted body weight vs median 3.2 cm H<sub>2</sub>O/mL/kg predicted body weight, <i>P</i> = .03). <b>Conclusions:</b> Pendelluft reflecting increased regional lung stress and strain is likely common during spontaneous breathing effort in patients with AHRF but was not systematically affected by applying higher PEEP. The presence and magnitude of pendelluft depended on respiratory effort and lung mechanics.

Respiratory CareVol. 70(2)
University Health Network (CA), University of Toronto (CA), Toronto General Hospital (CA), Furtwangen University (DE), Guangzhou Medical University (CN), The University of Osaka (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
7.59
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.