Resisting Ableism in Research Design
This paper explores how ableist assumptions can unintentionally create barriers to participation in research by those of non-normative bodies or minds. In traditional epistemology, bodies are considered “universal” rather than “specific,” and the universal body is coded as fully able-bodied and independent with brain and body adhering to normative standards of the White heterosexual English-speaking male. In this article, I present a story of “enabling participation” for those of diverse body capacity in my work with young women living with chronic illness.[1]Specifically, I explore the accommodations and adaptions I made to my research design to account for the non-normative form and function of my participants’ bodies and my own. Using the method of participant action research, the research participants became research co-collaborators as we collectively developed resources based on insider knowledge. Through sharing the story of my research, I invite other researchers to consider ways of enabling participation for a diverse array of bodies and minds in their own research.
Authors
- Gipsy Hosking
Publication Details
- Journal
- The Qualitative Report
- Published
- 2024-12-29
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2024.7808
- Primary Topic
- Posthumanist Ethics and Activism
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00