Toxicity evaluation and prioritization of recycled plastic food contact materials using in silico tools

This study assessed the toxicity of virgin and recycled plastic food contact materials (FCMs) at various recycling stages, migrated in four food simulants (water, 20 % ethanol, 4 % acetic acid, and n-heptane), using cytotoxicity and high-content screening (HCS) bioassays. Toxicity was correlated with migrating substances identified through chemical analyses, and samples were ranked by toxicity priority. Recycled polyethylene terephthalate (rPET) and 20 % ethanol exhibited the highest reduction in cell viability, whereas virgin PET (vPET) showed even lower viability. Pellets did not trigger oxidative responses in HepaRG and HK-2 cells; however, bales and flakes affected their cell morphology and mitochondrial function. rPET-flake migration in 4 % acetic acid was most toxic to HepaRG cells, while rPET-bale migration in 20 % ethanol and rPP-flake migration in water were most toxic to HK-2 cells. Nonetheless, the negative effects on cell viability and HCS parameters were mostly mitigated at the final pellet stage. In HepaRG cells exposed to 4 % acetic acid, antimony negatively correlated with cell viability and positively with cellular area, indicating its role in rPET-induced necrosis. ToxPi ranking identified vPET migration in n-heptane and water as top priorities given the nephrotoxic risks. This study emphasizes refining recycling methods and testing plastics to minimize FCM cytotoxicity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Hazardous Materials
Published
2025-02-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2025.137467
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.02
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Toxicity evaluation and prioritization of recycled plastic food contact materials using in silico tools

Rong-Jane Chen, Pei-Chun Hsu, Hsiu‐Ling Chen, Wei‐Hsiang Chang et al.
6 citations
Journal of Hazardous Materials
Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
3.02
article

Toxicity evaluation and prioritization of recycled plastic food contact materials using in silico tools

Rong-Jane Chen, Pei-Chun Hsu, Hsiu‐Ling Chen, Wei‐Hsiang Chang, Pei‐Shan Chih, Rachelle D. Arcega, Trias Mahmudiono, Ching-Chang Lee
article en
6 citations

Abstract

This study assessed the toxicity of virgin and recycled plastic food contact materials (FCMs) at various recycling stages, migrated in four food simulants (water, 20 % ethanol, 4 % acetic acid, and n-heptane), using cytotoxicity and high-content screening (HCS) bioassays. Toxicity was correlated with migrating substances identified through chemical analyses, and samples were ranked by toxicity priority. Recycled polyethylene terephthalate (rPET) and 20 % ethanol exhibited the highest reduction in cell viability, whereas virgin PET (vPET) showed even lower viability. Pellets did not trigger oxidative responses in HepaRG and HK-2 cells; however, bales and flakes affected their cell morphology and mitochondrial function. rPET-flake migration in 4 % acetic acid was most toxic to HepaRG cells, while rPET-bale migration in 20 % ethanol and rPP-flake migration in water were most toxic to HK-2 cells. Nonetheless, the negative effects on cell viability and HCS parameters were mostly mitigated at the final pellet stage. In HepaRG cells exposed to 4 % acetic acid, antimony negatively correlated with cell viability and positively with cellular area, indicating its role in rPET-induced necrosis. ToxPi ranking identified vPET migration in n-heptane and water as top priorities given the nephrotoxic risks. This study emphasizes refining recycling methods and testing plastics to minimize FCM cytotoxicity.

Journal of Hazardous MaterialsVol. 488
Universitas Airlangga (ID), National Cheng Kung University (TW)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
3.02
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.