Benchmark study of a new simplified DFN model for shearing of intersecting fractures and faults

It is challenging to quantitatively predict shearing of intersecting fractures/faults because of dynamic frictional contacts accompanied by possible nonlinear rock deformation. To address such challenges, a new conceptual model—the simplified DFN model—was proposed and validated by Hu et al. 46 to use major paths (MPs) to represent complicated DFNs for calculation of shearing. In this work, we conducted a benchmark study for three examples that involve different levels of complexity of intersecting fractures, and correspondingly different numbers of MPs. The codes and software that were used in the benchmark cover a range of continuum, discontinuum and hybrid numerical methods: NMM (LBNL), FLAC3D (LBNL), GBDEM (KIGAM), FRACOD (DynaFrax), and CASRock (CAS). The general consistency between DFN and MP cases as predicted by all the codes/software demonstrates that major paths can be used to simplify the geometry of DFNs in a wide range of software. Disagreement in results made by some software and potential future improvements are discussed. We show that (1) shearing of one or multiple major fractures can be reduced if there are multiple smaller intersecting fractures in that area, which is a useful basis for understanding and controlling induced seismicity and merits further analysis, and (2) the agreement achieved in the benchmark examples provide confidence that the simplified DFN model is a promising conceptual model that can be used for different types of numerical approaches and software for simplifying the analysis of the shearing of intersecting fractures and faults. • A benchmark study with five different software was conducted to test the simplified DFN model. • Possible mechanisms of stress relaxation and controlling of induced seismicity in DFN are discussed. • Disagreement in results and potential future improvements by different software are discussed. • The agreements between different software demonstrate that the simplified DFN model is applicable in a wide range of software.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geomechanics for Energy and the Environment
Published
2025-02-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gete.2025.100644
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.91

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Benchmark study of a new simplified DFN model for shearing of intersecting fractures and faults

Jens Birkhölzer, Jonny Rutqvist, T. SASAKI, Mengsu Hu et al.
2 citations
Geomechanics for Energy and the Environment
Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
1.91
article

Benchmark study of a new simplified DFN model for shearing of intersecting fractures and faults

Jens Birkhölzer, Jonny Rutqvist, T. SASAKI, Mengsu Hu, Jeoung Seok Yoon, Hejuan Liu, Olaf Kolditz, Chan–Hee Park, Jung–Wook Park, Zhaofeng Wang
article en
2 citations

Abstract

It is challenging to quantitatively predict shearing of intersecting fractures/faults because of dynamic frictional contacts accompanied by possible nonlinear rock deformation. To address such challenges, a new conceptual model—the simplified DFN model—was proposed and validated by Hu et al. 46 to use major paths (MPs) to represent complicated DFNs for calculation of shearing. In this work, we conducted a benchmark study for three examples that involve different levels of complexity of intersecting fractures, and correspondingly different numbers of MPs. The codes and software that were used in the benchmark cover a range of continuum, discontinuum and hybrid numerical methods: NMM (LBNL), FLAC3D (LBNL), GBDEM (KIGAM), FRACOD (DynaFrax), and CASRock (CAS). The general consistency between DFN and MP cases as predicted by all the codes/software demonstrates that major paths can be used to simplify the geometry of DFNs in a wide range of software. Disagreement in results made by some software and potential future improvements are discussed. We show that (1) shearing of one or multiple major fractures can be reduced if there are multiple smaller intersecting fractures in that area, which is a useful basis for understanding and controlling induced seismicity and merits further analysis, and (2) the agreement achieved in the benchmark examples provide confidence that the simplified DFN model is a promising conceptual model that can be used for different types of numerical approaches and software for simplifying the analysis of the shearing of intersecting fractures and faults. • A benchmark study with five different software was conducted to test the simplified DFN model. • Possible mechanisms of stress relaxation and controlling of induced seismicity in DFN are discussed. • Disagreement in results and potential future improvements by different software are discussed. • The agreements between different software demonstrate that the simplified DFN model is applicable in a wide range of software.

Geomechanics for Energy and the EnvironmentVol. 41
Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (DE), Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (US), Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics (CN), Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources (KR), Dynavax Technologies (Germany) (DE), Technische Universität Dresden (DE)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy, Ministry of Science and ICT, South Korea, Office of Spent Fuel and Waste Science and Technology
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
1.91
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.