Embodying the State in the Margins

This article explores the reconfigurations of state making in Turkey through an exploration of men’s circulation of conspiracy theories and engagements with vigilante violence since the 2000s. Rather than readily dismissing conspiratorial narratives because of their (anti)truth qualities, I suggest reading their circulation as a social practice through which (political) subjectivities and communities are forged. In addition, I argue that their circulation generates sociopolitical effects in the everyday. Detailing how the circulation of conspiratorial accounts generates vigilante violence against minorities and political dissent, the article demonstrates how stately privileges are delegated from the state to civilians. Within this configuration, states can no longer be conceived of as institutions that monopolize legitimate violence, as they come to rely on everyday breaches of the law by nonstate actors to exert their authority and control. The article concludes with a discussion of how the prevalence of societal violence against political dissent by nonstate actors might be said to reify, maintain, and reproduce the state, forcing us to rethink how conspiratorial narratives do not solely destabilize the truth but also generate dramatic setbacks for the way we conceive of society and politics.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Current Anthropology
Published
2025-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1086/733925
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Anthropological Studies and Insights
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
11.35
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Embodying the State in the Margins

Erol Sağlam
1 citations
Current Anthropology
Anthropological Studies and Insights
11.35
article

Embodying the State in the Margins

Erol Sağlam
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This article explores the reconfigurations of state making in Turkey through an exploration of men’s circulation of conspiracy theories and engagements with vigilante violence since the 2000s. Rather than readily dismissing conspiratorial narratives because of their (anti)truth qualities, I suggest reading their circulation as a social practice through which (political) subjectivities and communities are forged. In addition, I argue that their circulation generates sociopolitical effects in the everyday. Detailing how the circulation of conspiratorial accounts generates vigilante violence against minorities and political dissent, the article demonstrates how stately privileges are delegated from the state to civilians. Within this configuration, states can no longer be conceived of as institutions that monopolize legitimate violence, as they come to rely on everyday breaches of the law by nonstate actors to exert their authority and control. The article concludes with a discussion of how the prevalence of societal violence against political dissent by nonstate actors might be said to reify, maintain, and reproduce the state, forcing us to rethink how conspiratorial narratives do not solely destabilize the truth but also generate dramatic setbacks for the way we conceive of society and politics.

Current AnthropologyVol. 66(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Anthropological Studies and Insights
11.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.