$k^{m}$-Anonymization Meets Differential Privacy Under Sampling

Various models for evaluating anonymity have been proposed so far. Among them, <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$k$</tex>-anonymity is widely known as a typical anonymity measure, guaranteeing that at least <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$k$</tex> individuals in a database have the same values. Unfortunately, it is difficult to create highly useful anonymized data satisfying <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$k$</tex>-anonymity for high-dimensional data because of the curse of dimensionality. Several approaches relaxing <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$k$</tex>-anonymity have been proposed, such as <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$k^{m}$</tex>-anonymity, to overcome the problem. On the other hand, we have another privacy protection metric, developed by Dwork et al., and it is differential privacy. However, the full protection index for differential privacy, i.e., the level of noise that can satisfy the desired privacy, has not been clarified. This paper shows relationships between <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$k^{m}$</tex>-anonymity and differential privacy under sampling, proposed by Li et al., that is, a weak notion of differential privacy. Numerical experiments are then performed to give relations among the parameters of <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$k^{m}$</tex>-anonymity and differential privacy under sampling. These experiments also show relationships between <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$k$</tex>-anonymity and <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$k^{m}$</tex>-anonymity as <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$k$</tex>-anonymity is a special case of <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$k^{m}$</tex>-anonymity in some sense.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-11-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.23919/isita60732.2024.10858274
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.35
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

$k^{m}$-Anonymization Meets Differential Privacy Under Sampling

Koji Chida, Atsushi Fujioka, Kan Yasuda, Masaya Kobayashi et al.
1 citations
Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
0.35
article

$k^{m}$-Anonymization Meets Differential Privacy Under Sampling

Koji Chida, Atsushi Fujioka, Kan Yasuda, Masaya Kobayashi, Akira Nagai
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Various models for evaluating anonymity have been proposed so far. Among them, <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$k$</tex>-anonymity is widely known as a typical anonymity measure, guaranteeing that at least <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$k$</tex> individuals in a database have the same values. Unfortunately, it is difficult to create highly useful anonymized data satisfying <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$k$</tex>-anonymity for high-dimensional data because of the curse of dimensionality. Several approaches relaxing <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$k$</tex>-anonymity have been proposed, such as <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$k^{m}$</tex>-anonymity, to overcome the problem. On the other hand, we have another privacy protection metric, developed by Dwork et al., and it is differential privacy. However, the full protection index for differential privacy, i.e., the level of noise that can satisfy the desired privacy, has not been clarified. This paper shows relationships between <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$k^{m}$</tex>-anonymity and differential privacy under sampling, proposed by Li et al., that is, a weak notion of differential privacy. Numerical experiments are then performed to give relations among the parameters of <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$k^{m}$</tex>-anonymity and differential privacy under sampling. These experiments also show relationships between <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$k$</tex>-anonymity and <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$k^{m}$</tex>-anonymity as <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$k$</tex>-anonymity is a special case of <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$k^{m}$</tex>-anonymity in some sense.

Kanagawa University (JP)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
0.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.