Understanding the Detection Limits of a Vertically Packed Anisotropic Magnetoresistive Sensor System

In this work, we study the integration of anisotropic magnetoresistive (AMR) sensors in large arrays using a vertically packed architecture aiming at understanding the feasibility of increasing the sensor volume at a minimal footprint. The AMR elements were measured individually at different packing levels (from level <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">${M} =1$ </tex-math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">${M} =4$ </tex-math></inline-formula>) allowing the correlation of topography and roughness on each sensing layer with changes in key parameters of the R(H) curves, such as AMR(%), R, magnetic saturation field (<inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">${H} _{\mathbf {Sat}}$ </tex-math></inline-formula>), and sensitivity. Overall, for the studied geometry and designs, an increase in R is observed, leading to a slight decrease in AMR (from 2.4% to 2.2%), whereas magnetically, a linear increase in <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">${H} _{\mathbf {Sat}}$ </tex-math></inline-formula> is found (from <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">${\approx }3$ </tex-math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">${\approx }8$ </tex-math></inline-formula> mT). Calculated interlevel dipolar coupling is in good agreement with the experiments, indicating an expected linear increase in <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">${H} _{\mathbf {Sat}}$ </tex-math></inline-formula> of around 1.46 mT per level for the chosen geometry and spacer thickness. Finally, we compare the detectivity of the simple and compact architectures under external fields.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Magnetics
Published
2025-02-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/tmag.2025.3537683
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Sensor Technology and Measurement Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.49

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding the Detection Limits of a Vertically Packed Anisotropic Magnetoresistive Sensor System

Tatiane Fernandes, Susana Cardoso, P. Araujo, Rita Macedo et al.
1 citations
IEEE Transactions on Magnetics
Sensor Technology and Measurement Systems
1.49
article

Understanding the Detection Limits of a Vertically Packed Anisotropic Magnetoresistive Sensor System

Tatiane Fernandes, Susana Cardoso, P. Araujo, Rita Macedo, Guilherme Brites
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In this work, we study the integration of anisotropic magnetoresistive (AMR) sensors in large arrays using a vertically packed architecture aiming at understanding the feasibility of increasing the sensor volume at a minimal footprint. The AMR elements were measured individually at different packing levels (from level <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">${M} =1$ </tex-math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">${M} =4$ </tex-math></inline-formula>) allowing the correlation of topography and roughness on each sensing layer with changes in key parameters of the R(H) curves, such as AMR(%), R, magnetic saturation field (<inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">${H} _{\mathbf {Sat}}$ </tex-math></inline-formula>), and sensitivity. Overall, for the studied geometry and designs, an increase in R is observed, leading to a slight decrease in AMR (from 2.4% to 2.2%), whereas magnetically, a linear increase in <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">${H} _{\mathbf {Sat}}$ </tex-math></inline-formula> is found (from <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">${\approx }3$ </tex-math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">${\approx }8$ </tex-math></inline-formula> mT). Calculated interlevel dipolar coupling is in good agreement with the experiments, indicating an expected linear increase in <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">${H} _{\mathbf {Sat}}$ </tex-math></inline-formula> of around 1.46 mT per level for the chosen geometry and spacer thickness. Finally, we compare the detectivity of the simple and compact architectures under external fields.

IEEE Transactions on MagneticsVol. 61(6)
Instituto de Engenharia de Sistemas e Computadores Microsistemas e Nanotecnologias (PT)
Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Sensor Technology and Measurement Systems
1.49
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.