Hypergamy reconsidered: Marriage in England, 1837–2021

It is widely believed that women value social status in marital partners more than men, leading to female marital hypergamy ("marrying up"), and more female intergenerational social mobility. Using evidence from more than 33 million marriages and 67 million births in England 1837-2021 we show that within this era there was never significant hypergamous marriage by women. The average status of women's fathers equaled that of their husbands' fathers. For marriages 1912-2007 the average social status of female surnames equaled that of male. This was true also for parent surnames of children. Consistent with this, there was no differential tendency in England of men and women to marry by family status. There is also ancillary evidence that physical attraction cannot have been the significant determinant of matching in marriages in any period 1837-2021, based on the very strong correlation observed in underlying social status for marital partners throughout these years.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2025-02-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0316769
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.12
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hypergamy reconsidered: Marriage in England, 1837–2021

Neil Cummins, Gregory Clark
1 citations
PLoS ONE
Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
2.12
article

Hypergamy reconsidered: Marriage in England, 1837–2021

Neil Cummins, Gregory Clark
article en
1 citations

Abstract

It is widely believed that women value social status in marital partners more than men, leading to female marital hypergamy ("marrying up"), and more female intergenerational social mobility. Using evidence from more than 33 million marriages and 67 million births in England 1837-2021 we show that within this era there was never significant hypergamous marriage by women. The average status of women's fathers equaled that of their husbands' fathers. For marriages 1912-2007 the average social status of female surnames equaled that of male. This was true also for parent surnames of children. Consistent with this, there was no differential tendency in England of men and women to marry by family status. There is also ancillary evidence that physical attraction cannot have been the significant determinant of matching in marriages in any period 1837-2021, based on the very strong correlation observed in underlying social status for marital partners throughout these years.

PLoS ONEVol. 20(2)
University of Southern Denmark (DK), London School of Economics and Political Science (GB)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
2.12
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.