An evaluation of lived experience email peer support for young people with eating disorders
Peer support is where individuals with the same shared experience provide mutual support. Using a non-controlled repeated measure design, this study evaluates initial efficacy of one-to-one email peer support. Young people with an eating disorder were matched with a recovered volunteer befriender, for up to one year, providing 1-3 email contacts a week. All participants completed measures (self-esteem, self-efficacy, wellbeing) at start of service, two and four-month intervals for recipients (<i>n</i> = 92) and peer befrienders (<i>n</i> = 86) respectively, and at end of service. Recipients also completed measures of social connectedness, impact of eating disorder, and goal-based outcomes. Multilevel mixed-effects linear regression models indicated significant improvements across all outcomes for recipients by 4 months, apart from self-esteem, and improvements self-efficacy, eating disorder impact and goal-based outcomes maintained at end of service. Peer befrienders did not show changes in self-esteem or self-efficacy, but there was a small significant reduction in wellbeing. The study provides evidence for email peer support for young people with eating disorders and highlights the need for robust support for befriending roles.
Authors
- Imogen Peebles (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6286-1725)
- Fiona Duffy (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9162-9722)
- Brandon W. Hughes (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2742-6453)
- Helen Sharpe (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6980-1699)
- Sarah Taylor (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2651-9161)
- Sophie Brassill
Institutions
- NHS Lothian (GB)
- Norwich Research Park (GB)
- Royal Edinburgh Hospital (GB)
- University of Edinburgh (GB)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Eating Disorders
- Published
- 2025-02-03
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1080/10640266.2025.2459974
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Eating Disorders and Behaviors
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 2.31
Funders
- Scottish Government
- UK Research and Innovation
- National Institute for Health and Care Research
- Arts and Humanities Research Council
- Medical Research Council
- Economic and Social Research Council