Oregon Community Benefit Reform Influenced Not-For-Profit Hospitals’ Charity Care And Medical Debt Write-Off
Not-for-profit hospitals are required to provide community benefits to improve the well-being of their communities. However, hospitals' community benefit spending has remained mostly flat despite federal and state regulations intended to increase it. A new Oregon policy takes a multiphase approach to increase not-for-profit hospitals' community investment. In 2020, phase 1 expanded patient financial assistance requirements and medical debt protections. In 2021, phase 2 imposed a hospital-specific minimum community benefit spending floor. Using a nearest-neighbor matching difference-in-differences design and hospital financial data from the period 2016-22, we examined the impact of phase 1 requirements on charity care spending and bad debt. Oregon's patient financial assistance and medical debt protections were associated with higher charity care spending ($423,000 per hospital) and higher levels of bad debt ($846,000 per hospital) by Oregon hospitals relative to control hospitals. It is too soon to understand the effects of minimum community benefit spending floors.
Authors
- Tatiane Santos (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7501-6627)
- Gary J. Young (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4223-9971)
- Kelsey M. Owsley (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3745-4976)
- Shoou-Yih D. Lee (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0209-3234)
- Richard C. Lindrooth (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9538-9749)
Institutions
- Tulane University (US)
- Northeastern University (US)
- Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
- University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus (US)
- University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Health Affairs
- Published
- 2025-02-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2024.00760
- Citations
- 6
- Primary Topic
- Healthcare Policy and Management
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 18.79