Oregon Community Benefit Reform Influenced Not-For-Profit Hospitals’ Charity Care And Medical Debt Write-Off

Not-for-profit hospitals are required to provide community benefits to improve the well-being of their communities. However, hospitals' community benefit spending has remained mostly flat despite federal and state regulations intended to increase it. A new Oregon policy takes a multiphase approach to increase not-for-profit hospitals' community investment. In 2020, phase 1 expanded patient financial assistance requirements and medical debt protections. In 2021, phase 2 imposed a hospital-specific minimum community benefit spending floor. Using a nearest-neighbor matching difference-in-differences design and hospital financial data from the period 2016-22, we examined the impact of phase 1 requirements on charity care spending and bad debt. Oregon's patient financial assistance and medical debt protections were associated with higher charity care spending ($423,000 per hospital) and higher levels of bad debt ($846,000 per hospital) by Oregon hospitals relative to control hospitals. It is too soon to understand the effects of minimum community benefit spending floors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health Affairs
Published
2025-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2024.00760
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Healthcare Policy and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
18.79
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Oregon Community Benefit Reform Influenced Not-For-Profit Hospitals’ Charity Care And Medical Debt Write-Off

Tatiane Santos, Gary J. Young, Kelsey M. Owsley, Shoou-Yih D. Lee et al.
6 citations
Health Affairs
Healthcare Policy and Management
18.79
article

Oregon Community Benefit Reform Influenced Not-For-Profit Hospitals’ Charity Care And Medical Debt Write-Off

Tatiane Santos, Gary J. Young, Kelsey M. Owsley, Shoou-Yih D. Lee, Richard C. Lindrooth
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Not-for-profit hospitals are required to provide community benefits to improve the well-being of their communities. However, hospitals' community benefit spending has remained mostly flat despite federal and state regulations intended to increase it. A new Oregon policy takes a multiphase approach to increase not-for-profit hospitals' community investment. In 2020, phase 1 expanded patient financial assistance requirements and medical debt protections. In 2021, phase 2 imposed a hospital-specific minimum community benefit spending floor. Using a nearest-neighbor matching difference-in-differences design and hospital financial data from the period 2016-22, we examined the impact of phase 1 requirements on charity care spending and bad debt. Oregon's patient financial assistance and medical debt protections were associated with higher charity care spending ($423,000 per hospital) and higher levels of bad debt ($846,000 per hospital) by Oregon hospitals relative to control hospitals. It is too soon to understand the effects of minimum community benefit spending floors.

Health AffairsVol. 44(2)
Tulane University (US), Northeastern University (US), Virginia Commonwealth University (US), University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus (US), University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Healthcare Policy and Management
18.79
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Oregon Community Benefit Reform Influenced Not-For-Profit Hospitals’ Charity Care And Medical Debt Write-Off — Tatiane Santos, Gary J. Young, et al. · Health Affairs (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS