Aficamten vs Metoprolol for Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

Beta-blockers and nondihydropyridine calcium-channel blockers have been standard-of-care (SOC) medications for patients with symptomatic obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (oHCM), even though these agents do not directly affect the underlying pathophysiology of the disease. Cardiac myosin inhibitors act by decreasing the number of myosin heads binding to actin, reducing the pathologic hypercontractility of HCM, and have been shown to improve exercise capacity and alleviate symptoms in oHCM when added to SOC medications. Cardiac myosin inhibitors are currently considered as second-line therapy in the absence of head-to-head comparison studies vs SOC medications. The aim of the ongoing phase 3 study MAPLE-HCM (Metoprolol vs Aficamten in Patients With LVOT Obstruction on Exercise Capacity in HCM) is to fill this evidence gap by evaluating aficamten as both first-line therapy for newly diagnosed oHCM and as a monotherapy alternative for patients currently on SOC drugs. The authors describe the rationale, design, and baseline characteristics of patients in this study. (Phase 3 Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Aficamten Compared to Metoprolol Succinate in Adults With Symptomatic oHCM [MAPLE-HCM]; NCT05767346).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JACC Heart Failure
Published
2025-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchf.2024.11.011
Citations
18
Primary Topic
Cardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
24.99

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Aficamten vs Metoprolol for Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

Perry Elliott, Stephen B. Heitner, P. Christian Schulze, Ajith Nair et al.
18 citations
JACC Heart Failure
Cardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies
24.99
article

Aficamten vs Metoprolol for Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

Perry Elliott, Stephen B. Heitner, P. Christian Schulze, Ajith Nair, Amy Wohltman, Ozlem Bilen, Melissa Burroughs, Steen Hvitfeldt Poulsen, Anne M. Dybro, Andrew Z. Wang, Regina Sohn, Juan Pablo Costabel, Neal K. Lakdawala, Edileide de Barros Correia, Pablo García‐Pavía, Daniel Jacoby, Fady I. Malik, Stuart Kupfer, Michael A. Fifer, Indrias Berhane, Lisa Meng, Michael E. Nassif, Amy Mann, Patricia Réant
article en
18 citations

Abstract

Beta-blockers and nondihydropyridine calcium-channel blockers have been standard-of-care (SOC) medications for patients with symptomatic obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (oHCM), even though these agents do not directly affect the underlying pathophysiology of the disease. Cardiac myosin inhibitors act by decreasing the number of myosin heads binding to actin, reducing the pathologic hypercontractility of HCM, and have been shown to improve exercise capacity and alleviate symptoms in oHCM when added to SOC medications. Cardiac myosin inhibitors are currently considered as second-line therapy in the absence of head-to-head comparison studies vs SOC medications. The aim of the ongoing phase 3 study MAPLE-HCM (Metoprolol vs Aficamten in Patients With LVOT Obstruction on Exercise Capacity in HCM) is to fill this evidence gap by evaluating aficamten as both first-line therapy for newly diagnosed oHCM and as a monotherapy alternative for patients currently on SOC drugs. The authors describe the rationale, design, and baseline characteristics of patients in this study. (Phase 3 Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Aficamten Compared to Metoprolol Succinate in Adults With Symptomatic oHCM [MAPLE-HCM]; NCT05767346).

JACC Heart FailureVol. 13(2)
Brigham and Women's Hospital (US), WellStar Health System (US), Saint Luke's Health System (US), Emory University (US), Université de Bordeaux (FR), Baylor College of Medicine (US), Aarhus University Hospital (DK), University Medical Center (US), British Heart Foundation (GB), Massachusetts General Hospital (US), Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda (ES), Bordeaux Population Health (FR), Duke Medical Center (US), Saint Luke's Hospital (US), Cytokinetics (United States) (US), Instituto Dante Pazzanese de Cardiologia (BR), Instituto Cardiovascular de Buenos Aires (AR), University College London (GB), Friedrich Schiller University Jena (DE)
Cytokinetics
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Cardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies
24.99
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.