The estimated cost of preventing extinction and progressing recovery for Australia’s priority threatened species

The global extinction crisis is intensifying rapidly, driven by habitat loss, overexploitation, climate change, invasive species, and disease. This unprecedented loss of species not only threatens ecological integrity but also undermines ecosystem services vital for human survival. In response, many countries have set ambitious conservation targets such as halting species extinctions, yet the necessary financial commitments to achieve this are rarely prescribed. Estimating costs can be achieved using an ensemble of spatially variable species-specific cost models for threat abatement activities. We employ this method to provide a cost assessment to halt extinctions for Australia's priority terrestrial and freshwater species. We show that it will cost ~AUD15.6 billion/year for 30 y to halt extinctions for these 99 priority species (comparable to 1% of Australia's GDP). The more ambitious objectives to move priority species down one threat category (~AUD103.7 billion/year) or remove from the threatened species list entirely (~AUD157.7 billion/year) would require considerably more investment. Regardless of what is spent, we found that 16 (16%) priority species could not be removed from the threatened species list due to extensive historical declines and pervasive, ongoing, unmanageable threats, such as climate change. But implementing these efforts could ensure conservation benefits for over 43% of all nationally listed nonmarine threatened species. Adequate funding is crucial for meeting government commitments and requires both government leadership and private sector investment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2025-02-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2414985122
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Species Distribution and Climate Change
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.19
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The estimated cost of preventing extinction and progressing recovery for Australia’s priority threatened species

James E. M. Watson, John C. Z. Woinarski, Chuanji Yong, Michelle Ward et al.
5 citations
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Species Distribution and Climate Change
9.19
article

The estimated cost of preventing extinction and progressing recovery for Australia’s priority threatened species

James E. M. Watson, John C. Z. Woinarski, Chuanji Yong, Michelle Ward, Romola Stewart, Mark Lintermans, Ayesha Tulloch, Benjamin C. Scheele, Nick S. Whiterod, David G. Chapple, Hugh P. Possingham, Brendan A. Wintle, Conrad J. Hoskin, Jessica Marsh, Bora Aska
article en
5 citations

Abstract

The global extinction crisis is intensifying rapidly, driven by habitat loss, overexploitation, climate change, invasive species, and disease. This unprecedented loss of species not only threatens ecological integrity but also undermines ecosystem services vital for human survival. In response, many countries have set ambitious conservation targets such as halting species extinctions, yet the necessary financial commitments to achieve this are rarely prescribed. Estimating costs can be achieved using an ensemble of spatially variable species-specific cost models for threat abatement activities. We employ this method to provide a cost assessment to halt extinctions for Australia's priority terrestrial and freshwater species. We show that it will cost ~AUD15.6 billion/year for 30 y to halt extinctions for these 99 priority species (comparable to 1% of Australia's GDP). The more ambitious objectives to move priority species down one threat category (~AUD103.7 billion/year) or remove from the threatened species list entirely (~AUD157.7 billion/year) would require considerably more investment. Regardless of what is spent, we found that 16 (16%) priority species could not be removed from the threatened species list due to extensive historical declines and pervasive, ongoing, unmanageable threats, such as climate change. But implementing these efforts could ensure conservation benefits for over 43% of all nationally listed nonmarine threatened species. Adequate funding is crucial for meeting government commitments and requires both government leadership and private sector investment.

Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesVol. 122(6)
Griffith University (AU), Australian National University (AU), Queensland University of Technology (AU), The University of Queensland (AU), The University of Melbourne (AU), The University of Western Australia (AU), University of Canberra (AU), Charles Darwin University (AU), Oeko Institut (DE), Goyder Institute for Water Research (AU), ID-FISH Technology (United States) (US), Monash University (AU), The University of Adelaide (AU), James Cook University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Species Distribution and Climate Change
9.19
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.