Quantitative error analysis of polarimetric phased-array radar weather measurements to reveal radar performance and configuration potential

Abstract. The initial weather measurements from two polarimetric phased-array radars (PPARs) with cylindrical and planar configurations, both developed by the Advanced Radar Research Center (ARRC) at the University of Oklahoma (OU), were compared with those from the dish antenna systems, the operational KTLX Weather Surveillance Radar 1988 Doppler (WSR-88D) located in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma (∼ 23 km northeast of OU). Both the cylindrical PPAR (CPPAR) and the planar PPAR (PPPAR) Horus are S-band two-dimensional (2D) electronic scan PPARs. This comparison investigates the error statistics of the polarimetric measurements in one-dimensional (1D) electronic scans from each radar during two convective rain events. The first event occurred on 30 August 2019, when the CPPAR performed a 3.3° elevation plan-position indicator (PPI) scan at 25 azimuth angles. The second event took place on 4 October 2023, when Horus conducted range–height indicator (RHI) scans at 64 elevations. For both events, KTLX provided volumetric polarimetric radar data and served as the reference. To ensure temporal and spatial alignment between the radars, reconstructed RHI scans and PPI sectors from KTLX were matched to the corresponding Horus rays and CPPAR domain, respectively. The standard deviations and mean biases of the PPAR weather measurements were calculated and analyzed. The standard deviations of the two PPARs were similar and met the Radar Functional Requirements (RFR) set by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Weather Service. However, as noted in previous studies, the standard deviation and biases of polarimetric variables from Horus exhibited varying error characteristics depending on the electronic steering angle from broadside. The present results suggest that PPPARs may have difficulties in producing high-quality polarimetric data at large steering angles, and further investigation on CPPARs is required to find the optimal design for future weather applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Atmospheric measurement techniques
Published
2025-02-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-619-2025
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Precipitation Measurement and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.30

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quantitative error analysis of polarimetric phased-array radar weather measurements to reveal radar performance and configuration potential

Zhe Li, Guifu Zhang, Junho Ho
1 citations
Atmospheric measurement techniques
Precipitation Measurement and Analysis
1.30
article

Quantitative error analysis of polarimetric phased-array radar weather measurements to reveal radar performance and configuration potential

Zhe Li, Guifu Zhang, Junho Ho
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract. The initial weather measurements from two polarimetric phased-array radars (PPARs) with cylindrical and planar configurations, both developed by the Advanced Radar Research Center (ARRC) at the University of Oklahoma (OU), were compared with those from the dish antenna systems, the operational KTLX Weather Surveillance Radar 1988 Doppler (WSR-88D) located in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma (∼ 23 km northeast of OU). Both the cylindrical PPAR (CPPAR) and the planar PPAR (PPPAR) Horus are S-band two-dimensional (2D) electronic scan PPARs. This comparison investigates the error statistics of the polarimetric measurements in one-dimensional (1D) electronic scans from each radar during two convective rain events. The first event occurred on 30 August 2019, when the CPPAR performed a 3.3° elevation plan-position indicator (PPI) scan at 25 azimuth angles. The second event took place on 4 October 2023, when Horus conducted range–height indicator (RHI) scans at 64 elevations. For both events, KTLX provided volumetric polarimetric radar data and served as the reference. To ensure temporal and spatial alignment between the radars, reconstructed RHI scans and PPI sectors from KTLX were matched to the corresponding Horus rays and CPPAR domain, respectively. The standard deviations and mean biases of the PPAR weather measurements were calculated and analyzed. The standard deviations of the two PPARs were similar and met the Radar Functional Requirements (RFR) set by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Weather Service. However, as noted in previous studies, the standard deviation and biases of polarimetric variables from Horus exhibited varying error characteristics depending on the electronic steering angle from broadside. The present results suggest that PPPARs may have difficulties in producing high-quality polarimetric data at large steering angles, and further investigation on CPPARs is required to find the optimal design for future weather applications.

Atmospheric measurement techniquesVol. 18(3)
Radar (United States) (US), University of Oklahoma (US), MathWorks (United States) (US)
National Science Foundation, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Precipitation Measurement and Analysis
1.30
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.