Generative AI chatbots for reliable cancer information: Evaluating web-search, multilingual, and reference capabilities of emerging large language models

Recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) enable real-time web search, improved referencing, and multilingual support, yet ensuring they provide safe health information remains crucial. This perspective evaluates seven publicly accessible LLMs-ChatGPT, Co-Pilot, Gemini, MetaAI, Claude, Grok, Perplexity-on three simple cancer-related queries across eight languages (336 responses: English, French, Chinese, Thai, Hindi, Nepali, Vietnamese, and Arabic). None of the 42 English responses contained clinically meaningful hallucinations, whereas 7 of 294 non-English responses did. 48 % (162/336) of responses included valid references, but 39 % of the English references were.com links reflecting quality concerns. English responses frequently exceeded an eighth-grade level, and many non-English outputs were also complex. These findings reflect substantial progress over the past 2-years but reveal persistent gaps in multilingual accuracy, reliable reference inclusion, referral practices, and readability. Ongoing benchmarking is essential to ensure LLMs safely support global health information dichotomy and meet online information standards.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Cancer
Published
2025-02-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2025.115274
Citations
23
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
15.05

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Generative AI chatbots for reliable cancer information: Evaluating web-search, multilingual, and reference capabilities of emerging large language models

Benjamin Chu, Agnès Vitry, Stephen Bacchi, Ganessan Kichenadasse et al.
23 citations
European Journal of Cancer
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
15.05
article

Generative AI chatbots for reliable cancer information: Evaluating web-search, multilingual, and reference capabilities of emerging large language models

Benjamin Chu, Agnès Vitry, Stephen Bacchi, Ganessan Kichenadasse, Adel Shahnam, Andrew Rowland, Lee X. Li, Natansh D. Modi, Warit Ruanglertboon, Ashley M. Hopkins, Michael J. Sorich, Rakchha Chhetri, Bradley D. Menz, Ahmad Y. Abuhelwa, Yuan Gao
article en
23 citations

Abstract

Recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) enable real-time web search, improved referencing, and multilingual support, yet ensuring they provide safe health information remains crucial. This perspective evaluates seven publicly accessible LLMs-ChatGPT, Co-Pilot, Gemini, MetaAI, Claude, Grok, Perplexity-on three simple cancer-related queries across eight languages (336 responses: English, French, Chinese, Thai, Hindi, Nepali, Vietnamese, and Arabic). None of the 42 English responses contained clinically meaningful hallucinations, whereas 7 of 294 non-English responses did. 48 % (162/336) of responses included valid references, but 39 % of the English references were.com links reflecting quality concerns. English responses frequently exceeded an eighth-grade level, and many non-English outputs were also complex. These findings reflect substantial progress over the past 2-years but reveal persistent gaps in multilingual accuracy, reliable reference inclusion, referral practices, and readability. Ongoing benchmarking is essential to ensure LLMs safely support global health information dichotomy and meet online information standards.

European Journal of CancerVol. 218
Prince of Songkla University (TH), Flinders University (AU), University of South Australia (AU), Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre (AU), Flinders Medical Centre (AU), University of Sharjah (AE), Massachusetts General Hospital (US), Center for Systems Biology (US)
Hospital Research Foundation, Fulbright Australia, Tour de Cure, Medical Research Council, National Health and Medical Research Council, Cancer Council South Australia
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
15.05
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.