Microwave Ablation of T1a and T1b Renal Masses: A Retrospective Study

Abstract Purpose The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of microwave ablation (MWA) for the treatment of T1a and T1b renal masses, with size ranges between 1.2 and 6.5 cm. Methods A retrospective review was performed at a single tertiary comprehensive cancer center between June 2019 and June 2023 of 49 consecutive patients (53 total procedures) who underwent MWA for renal masses. The Solero microwave tissue ablation system (Angiodynamics, Latham, NY, United States) was utilized. Patient demographics, renal mass characteristics, and procedural outcomes were collected. Serum creatinine and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) were utilized to assess renal functional outcomes. Oncologic outcomes were assessed using evidence of local tumor recurrence on contrast-enhanced cross-sectional imaging, local recurrence-free probability at 1 and 2 years, and overall survival (OS) using the Kaplan–Meier analysis. Results Forty-nine patients (57% males and 43% females) with a median age of 72 years (range, 38–84 years) underwent 53 MWA procedures. The mean renal mass size was 2.8 ± 0.94 cm (range, 1.2–6.5 cm). Most of the renal tumors were T1a. Three of the 53 total renal tumors were larger than 4 cm (T1b) and the remaining 50 were less than 4 cm in size (T1a). The largest tumor that was ablated was 6.5 cm in size. All the patients were placed under general anesthesia (intubated) before the MWA procedure. A median microwave energy of 100 W (range, 60–140 W) was used. The mean duration of the MWA was 3.9 ± 1.5 minutes, with a 100% technical success rate. Four patients (8.2%) experienced complications, two (4.1%) of whom experienced a major complication. There was no clinically significant change in renal function from pre- to postablation on day 1 or at 3 months. Furthermore, local tumor recurrence was observed in three (6.1%) patients at 2.5, 15, and 25 months postablation. Local recurrence-free probability was 98 and 93% at 1 and 2 years, respectively. The OS was 98 and 87% at 1 and 2 years, respectively. Conclusion MWA continues to prove to be an effective technique that can be used to treat small renal masses including oncocytomas, with high technical success, low complication rate, low risk of adverse renal functional outcomes, and encouraging results for sustained tumor control.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Interventional Radiology ISVIR
Published
2025-02-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1801792
Primary Topic
Renal cell carcinoma treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Microwave Ablation of T1a and T1b Renal Masses: A Retrospective Study

Sandeep Laroia, Chad R. Tracy, Ajmain Chowdhury, Karan Rao et al.
Journal of Clinical Interventional Radiology ISVIR
Renal cell carcinoma treatment
article

Microwave Ablation of T1a and T1b Renal Masses: A Retrospective Study

Sandeep Laroia, Chad R. Tracy, Ajmain Chowdhury, Karan Rao, Bruce A. Smith, Assim Saad Eddin, Bradford Oliva, Shetty Zubin
article en

Abstract

Abstract Purpose The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of microwave ablation (MWA) for the treatment of T1a and T1b renal masses, with size ranges between 1.2 and 6.5 cm. Methods A retrospective review was performed at a single tertiary comprehensive cancer center between June 2019 and June 2023 of 49 consecutive patients (53 total procedures) who underwent MWA for renal masses. The Solero microwave tissue ablation system (Angiodynamics, Latham, NY, United States) was utilized. Patient demographics, renal mass characteristics, and procedural outcomes were collected. Serum creatinine and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) were utilized to assess renal functional outcomes. Oncologic outcomes were assessed using evidence of local tumor recurrence on contrast-enhanced cross-sectional imaging, local recurrence-free probability at 1 and 2 years, and overall survival (OS) using the Kaplan–Meier analysis. Results Forty-nine patients (57% males and 43% females) with a median age of 72 years (range, 38–84 years) underwent 53 MWA procedures. The mean renal mass size was 2.8 ± 0.94 cm (range, 1.2–6.5 cm). Most of the renal tumors were T1a. Three of the 53 total renal tumors were larger than 4 cm (T1b) and the remaining 50 were less than 4 cm in size (T1a). The largest tumor that was ablated was 6.5 cm in size. All the patients were placed under general anesthesia (intubated) before the MWA procedure. A median microwave energy of 100 W (range, 60–140 W) was used. The mean duration of the MWA was 3.9 ± 1.5 minutes, with a 100% technical success rate. Four patients (8.2%) experienced complications, two (4.1%) of whom experienced a major complication. There was no clinically significant change in renal function from pre- to postablation on day 1 or at 3 months. Furthermore, local tumor recurrence was observed in three (6.1%) patients at 2.5, 15, and 25 months postablation. Local recurrence-free probability was 98 and 93% at 1 and 2 years, respectively. The OS was 98 and 87% at 1 and 2 years, respectively. Conclusion MWA continues to prove to be an effective technique that can be used to treat small renal masses including oncocytomas, with high technical success, low complication rate, low risk of adverse renal functional outcomes, and encouraging results for sustained tumor control.

Journal of Clinical Interventional Radiology ISVIRVol. 09(01)
University of Iowa (US), University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Renal cell carcinoma treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.