Using a Standard‐Based Innovation Management System Approach—A Catalyst for Innovation Legitimacy?

ABSTRACT This study explores how the use of a standard‐based Innovation Management System approach influences the legitimacy for innovation management—a management discipline often subject to innovation fads and fashions. Utilizing neo institutional theory as a lens, we explore how this approach increased legitimacy for innovation management in case studies of two large organizations, and how this in turn affected innovation activities. Theoretically, we contribute by adding construct clarity to the concept of legitimacy, in relation to management systems, and by increasing understanding of the role of legitimacy in innovation activities. Managerial implications include the potential use of an Innovation Management Systems Standard to create a common language for innovation, to systematize innovation efforts and improve the perceived seriosity of innovation management, which in turn enables more robust and continuous innovation efforts in organizations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
R and D Management
Published
2025-02-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12756
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Innovation and Knowledge Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.68
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Using a Standard‐Based Innovation Management System Approach—A Catalyst for Innovation Legitimacy?

Mats Magnusson, Kristoffer Lerche
3 citations
R and D Management
Innovation and Knowledge Management
6.68
article

Using a Standard‐Based Innovation Management System Approach—A Catalyst for Innovation Legitimacy?

Mats Magnusson, Kristoffer Lerche
article en
3 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study explores how the use of a standard‐based Innovation Management System approach influences the legitimacy for innovation management—a management discipline often subject to innovation fads and fashions. Utilizing neo institutional theory as a lens, we explore how this approach increased legitimacy for innovation management in case studies of two large organizations, and how this in turn affected innovation activities. Theoretically, we contribute by adding construct clarity to the concept of legitimacy, in relation to management systems, and by increasing understanding of the role of legitimacy in innovation activities. Managerial implications include the potential use of an Innovation Management Systems Standard to create a common language for innovation, to systematize innovation efforts and improve the perceived seriosity of innovation management, which in turn enables more robust and continuous innovation efforts in organizations.

R and D ManagementVol. 55(4)
Aarhus University (DK), Aarhus Business College (DK), KTH Royal Institute of Technology (SE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Innovation and Knowledge Management
6.68
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Using a Standard‐Based Innovation Management System Approach—A Catalyst for Innovation Legitimacy? — Mats Magnusson, Kristoffer Lerche · R and D Management (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS