Perceptions of Korean Independence and International Affairs among Koreans in China through “the Pacific Conference and the Korean Issue”

This article analyses “the Pacific Conference and the Korean Issue” (hereafter referred to as “the Korean Issue”) to examine one aspect of the perceptions of the Chinese community regarding Korean independence and international affairs at the time of the Washington Conference. Many Koreans at home and abroad, including the Shanghai Provisional Government, were very interested and excited about the Washington Conference. They recognised the Washington Conference as an important opportunity to resolve the issue of Korean independence and actively sought to resolve it diplomatically. “The Korean Issue”, written by a Korean living in China at the time of the Washington Conference, reflects the perception of Korean independence and international affairs among Koreans living in China at the time.<br/> This article analyses “the Korean Issue” by focusing on three aspects. First, it sought to identify the author of “the Korean Issue”. Using the author information of “李麗民”, I found that the author was most likely Lee Yunjae, a hangeul scholar. Second, the logic and methods of “The Korean Issue” as a whole are quite similar to those of the Shanghai Provisional Government. However, whereas the Shanghai Provisional Government rarely assumes the influence of the Russian Communist Party, the influence of the Russian Communist Party is repeatedly mentioned throughout the text. Third, if “The Korean Issue” is authentically Lee Yunjae’s writing, then his academic and journalistic activities in Peking should be considered to have begun in 1921, and his early ideas need to be re-examined to some extent.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Korean Studies of Modern Chinese History
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.29323/mchina.2024.12.104.121
Primary Topic
Korean Peninsula Historical and Political Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Perceptions of Korean Independence and International Affairs among Koreans in China through “the Pacific Conference and the Korean Issue”

Taekkyung Kim
Korean Studies of Modern Chinese History
Korean Peninsula Historical and Political Studies
article

Perceptions of Korean Independence and International Affairs among Koreans in China through “the Pacific Conference and the Korean Issue”

Taekkyung Kim
article en

Abstract

This article analyses “the Pacific Conference and the Korean Issue” (hereafter referred to as “the Korean Issue”) to examine one aspect of the perceptions of the Chinese community regarding Korean independence and international affairs at the time of the Washington Conference. Many Koreans at home and abroad, including the Shanghai Provisional Government, were very interested and excited about the Washington Conference. They recognised the Washington Conference as an important opportunity to resolve the issue of Korean independence and actively sought to resolve it diplomatically. “The Korean Issue”, written by a Korean living in China at the time of the Washington Conference, reflects the perception of Korean independence and international affairs among Koreans living in China at the time.<br/> This article analyses “the Korean Issue” by focusing on three aspects. First, it sought to identify the author of “the Korean Issue”. Using the author information of “李麗民”, I found that the author was most likely Lee Yunjae, a hangeul scholar. Second, the logic and methods of “The Korean Issue” as a whole are quite similar to those of the Shanghai Provisional Government. However, whereas the Shanghai Provisional Government rarely assumes the influence of the Russian Communist Party, the influence of the Russian Communist Party is repeatedly mentioned throughout the text. Third, if “The Korean Issue” is authentically Lee Yunjae’s writing, then his academic and journalistic activities in Peking should be considered to have begun in 1921, and his early ideas need to be re-examined to some extent.

Korean Studies of Modern Chinese HistoryVol. 104
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Korean Peninsula Historical and Political Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.