A Deep Dive into the RAISE Project Methodology
This animation explains the methodology used in the Research for Artificial Intelligence-Based Surrogate Endpoint (RAISE) project, presented in two manuscripts recently published in Future Oncology. This exploratory work assessed whether deep learning techniques could improve early progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), using features extracted from computerized tomography scans from patients in the CLARINET phase 3 trial. As part of the RAISE project, response heterogeneity (the coexistence of responding and non-responding lesions in the same patient) was also investigated to assess whether it could be used as a biomarker to allow earlier prediction of PFS in patients with NETs. Previous definitions of response heterogeneity are not suitable for assessing slow-growing tumors, such as NETs, so the definition of response heterogeneity was adapted in this study and is described in this animation.
Authors
- Dalvinder Mandair (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5237-8641)
- Delphine Gueguen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6813-0579)
- Olivier Dehaene
- Simon Jégou
- Félix Balazard (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3336-0128)
- David Cahané
- Kathryn Schutte (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5161-6927)
- Clarisse Dromain (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2999-1958)
- Niklaus Schaefer (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9732-7696)
- Maxime Ronot (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7464-3939)
- Catherine Cheng (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1619-9320)
- D. Elvira
Institutions
- Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (DE)
- Ipsen (France) (FR)
- The Royal Free Hospital (GB)
- Délégation Provence et Corse (FR)
- Abbott (France) (FR)
- University College London (GB)
- University of Lausanne (CH)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Video Journal of Biomedicine
- Published
- 2025-02-03
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1080/vjbm-2023-0018
- Primary Topic
- Neuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00