The theory of temporary organization three decades later: Re-visiting the 4 T framework, focusing tensions, adding project plasticity

For more than three decades, the notion of temporary organization in general, and the 4 T framework in particular, has informed research on managing projects. In a similarly important way, it has helped to connect this field of scholarly inquiry more closely with management and organization studies. While the 4 T framework with its four dimensions (time, task, team, and transition) has often been referred to, few have criticized or developed it further. In this paper we review the respective literature and propose to focus more on practices and tensions and, in particular, add the tension-ridden concept of project plasticity, which captures the ability of projects to change substantially and yet stay the same in the eyes of those involved. But instead of adding a fifth T, we highlight with this addition the fundamental tension between stability and change. Like the classic and already well-researched tension between organizational autonomy and contextual embeddedness this particular tension is not only extremely relevant for managing temporary organizations, but also cuts across the four classic dimensions and refines our understanding of the dynamic nature inherent to temporary organizations. We illustrate our argument with the example of an interorganizational project from the construction industry. • For quite some time, projects have been conceived as a form of temporary organization, allowing project studies to be linked more easily to management and organization research. • The theory of temporary organization or 4 T framework – comprising time, task, team, and transition – is reviewed in light of the debate it has triggered over the last three decades. • Focusing on tensions and based on a still nascent discussion about ‘plasticity’ in management and organization research as well as empirical insights from a study of an inter-organizational project, it is proposed to add ‘project plasticity’ – like other tensions – as an important aspect across the 4 Ts. • Implications for managing temporary organizations and future research are highlighted.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scandinavian Journal of Management
Published
2025-02-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2025.101405
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Construction Project Management and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
16.85
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The theory of temporary organization three decades later: Re-visiting the 4 T framework, focusing tensions, adding project plasticity

Timo Braun, Rolf A. Lundin, Eskil Ekstedt, Jörg Sydow
8 citations
Scandinavian Journal of Management
Construction Project Management and Performance
16.85
article

The theory of temporary organization three decades later: Re-visiting the 4 T framework, focusing tensions, adding project plasticity

Timo Braun, Rolf A. Lundin, Eskil Ekstedt, Jörg Sydow
article en
8 citations

Abstract

For more than three decades, the notion of temporary organization in general, and the 4 T framework in particular, has informed research on managing projects. In a similarly important way, it has helped to connect this field of scholarly inquiry more closely with management and organization studies. While the 4 T framework with its four dimensions (time, task, team, and transition) has often been referred to, few have criticized or developed it further. In this paper we review the respective literature and propose to focus more on practices and tensions and, in particular, add the tension-ridden concept of project plasticity, which captures the ability of projects to change substantially and yet stay the same in the eyes of those involved. But instead of adding a fifth T, we highlight with this addition the fundamental tension between stability and change. Like the classic and already well-researched tension between organizational autonomy and contextual embeddedness this particular tension is not only extremely relevant for managing temporary organizations, but also cuts across the four classic dimensions and refines our understanding of the dynamic nature inherent to temporary organizations. We illustrate our argument with the example of an interorganizational project from the construction industry. • For quite some time, projects have been conceived as a form of temporary organization, allowing project studies to be linked more easily to management and organization research. • The theory of temporary organization or 4 T framework – comprising time, task, team, and transition – is reviewed in light of the debate it has triggered over the last three decades. • Focusing on tensions and based on a still nascent discussion about ‘plasticity’ in management and organization research as well as empirical insights from a study of an inter-organizational project, it is proposed to add ‘project plasticity’ – like other tensions – as an important aspect across the 4 Ts. • Implications for managing temporary organizations and future research are highlighted.

Scandinavian Journal of ManagementVol. 41(2)
University of Kassel (DE), Uppsala University (SE), Freie Universität Berlin (DE), Jönköping University (SE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Construction Project Management and Performance
16.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.