The Role of the Constitutional Court of Georgia in Protecting Constitutional Human Rights and Freedoms

In line with the Constitution of Georgia, constitutional oversight is executed by a specially established entity—the Constitutional Court of Georgia. This Court serves as a guardian of fundamental human rights and freedoms. Through the submission of individual constitutional complaints to the Constitutional Court, individuals are afforded a mechanism to advocate for their rights. Consequently, the individual constitutional complaint represents a critical legal tool aimed at providing effective legal protection and upholding the Constitution. While there are numerous issues concerning the nuances of constitutional proceedings in the context of individual constitutional complaints, many of these issues remain inadequately explored. Thus, the objective of this article is to examine the prevailing challenges associated with the Constitutional Court of Georgia's role in safeguarding human constitutional rights and freedoms. It seeks to uncover the unique aspects of proceedings involving individual constitutional complaints, scrutinize existing theoretical dilemmas, and present resolved viewpoints.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-02-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.52340/zssulaw.2023.01.08
Primary Topic
Legal and Policy Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Role of the Constitutional Court of Georgia in Protecting Constitutional Human Rights and Freedoms

Tamar Urushadze
Legal and Policy Issues
article

The Role of the Constitutional Court of Georgia in Protecting Constitutional Human Rights and Freedoms

Tamar Urushadze
article en

Abstract

In line with the Constitution of Georgia, constitutional oversight is executed by a specially established entity—the Constitutional Court of Georgia. This Court serves as a guardian of fundamental human rights and freedoms. Through the submission of individual constitutional complaints to the Constitutional Court, individuals are afforded a mechanism to advocate for their rights. Consequently, the individual constitutional complaint represents a critical legal tool aimed at providing effective legal protection and upholding the Constitution. While there are numerous issues concerning the nuances of constitutional proceedings in the context of individual constitutional complaints, many of these issues remain inadequately explored. Thus, the objective of this article is to examine the prevailing challenges associated with the Constitutional Court of Georgia's role in safeguarding human constitutional rights and freedoms. It seeks to uncover the unique aspects of proceedings involving individual constitutional complaints, scrutinize existing theoretical dilemmas, and present resolved viewpoints.

Grigol Robakidze University (GE)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Legal and Policy Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.