Why is Mouth Self-Examination Still Not Recommended for Early Detection of Oral Cancer and Oral Potentially Malignant Disorders?

Oral self-examination still remains enigmatic considering its functionality in detecting malignant disorders in the mouth. Although this tool is not concretely implemented in any health service, several studies have considered it as a real possibility for the screening and the early diagnosis of oral cancer. However, the heterogeneity of the methodologies applied in these studies makes their results inconsistent and imprecise, making the validation of oral self-examination impossible to date. Thus, once the methodological issues that compromise the real efficacy of self-examination have been resolved, this tool should be used and perhaps be considered essential as a strategy to detect malignant lesions, contributing to more favorable outcomes for oral cancer in public health.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Revista Brasileira de Cancerologia
Published
2025-02-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.32635/2176-9745.rbc.2025v71n1.4908
Primary Topic
Oral Health Pathology and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Why is Mouth Self-Examination Still Not Recommended for Early Detection of Oral Cancer and Oral Potentially Malignant Disorders?

José Alexandre da Rocha Curvelo, Daniel Cohen Goldemberg, Andréia Cristina de Melo, B.M. Silva et al.
Revista Brasileira de Cancerologia
Oral Health Pathology and Treatment
article

Why is Mouth Self-Examination Still Not Recommended for Early Detection of Oral Cancer and Oral Potentially Malignant Disorders?

José Alexandre da Rocha Curvelo, Daniel Cohen Goldemberg, Andréia Cristina de Melo, B.M. Silva, João Azevedo, Rosalina Barroso
article en

Abstract

Oral self-examination still remains enigmatic considering its functionality in detecting malignant disorders in the mouth. Although this tool is not concretely implemented in any health service, several studies have considered it as a real possibility for the screening and the early diagnosis of oral cancer. However, the heterogeneity of the methodologies applied in these studies makes their results inconsistent and imprecise, making the validation of oral self-examination impossible to date. Thus, once the methodological issues that compromise the real efficacy of self-examination have been resolved, this tool should be used and perhaps be considered essential as a strategy to detect malignant lesions, contributing to more favorable outcomes for oral cancer in public health.

Revista Brasileira de CancerologiaVol. 71(1)
Instituto Nacional de Câncer - INCA (BR), University College London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Oral Health Pathology and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Why is Mouth Self-Examination Still Not Recommended for Early Detection of Oral Cancer and Oral Potentially Malignant Disorders? — José Alexandre da Rocha Curvelo, Daniel Cohen Goldemberg, et al. · Revista Brasileira de Cancerologia (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS