The Big Three Passive Investors and the Cost of Equity Capital

This study investigates the role of the Big Three passive investors (BlackRock, Vanguard, and State Street) in influencing firms’ cost of equity. By examining the unique ownership structure these investors bring, the research sheds light on a pivotal yet underexplored aspect of institutional ownership and its implications for corporate financing. Using a comprehensive dataset spanning from 1997 to 2016, this study demonstrates that increased ownership by the Big Three is associated with improved disclosure practices and reduced information asymmetry, leading to a lower cost of equity. However, the study also uncovers a nuanced trade-off, as concentrated ownership may introduce liquidity risks in certain contexts. These findings bridge a critical gap in the literature by reconciling divergent perspectives on the role of passive investors and provide actionable insights for institutional investors, regulators, and corporate managers seeking to understand the broader implications of passive ownership on firm valuation and financing strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of risk and financial management
Published
2025-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm18020071
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.62
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Big Three Passive Investors and the Cost of Equity Capital

Sebahattin Demirkan, Ted M. Fikret Polat
3 citations
Journal of risk and financial management
Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
6.62
article

The Big Three Passive Investors and the Cost of Equity Capital

Sebahattin Demirkan, Ted M. Fikret Polat
article en
3 citations

Abstract

This study investigates the role of the Big Three passive investors (BlackRock, Vanguard, and State Street) in influencing firms’ cost of equity. By examining the unique ownership structure these investors bring, the research sheds light on a pivotal yet underexplored aspect of institutional ownership and its implications for corporate financing. Using a comprehensive dataset spanning from 1997 to 2016, this study demonstrates that increased ownership by the Big Three is associated with improved disclosure practices and reduced information asymmetry, leading to a lower cost of equity. However, the study also uncovers a nuanced trade-off, as concentrated ownership may introduce liquidity risks in certain contexts. These findings bridge a critical gap in the literature by reconciling divergent perspectives on the role of passive investors and provide actionable insights for institutional investors, regulators, and corporate managers seeking to understand the broader implications of passive ownership on firm valuation and financing strategies.

Journal of risk and financial managementVol. 18(2)
George Mason University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
6.62
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Big Three Passive Investors and the Cost of Equity Capital — Sebahattin Demirkan, Ted M. Fikret Polat · Journal of risk and financial management (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS