Survival of Endodontically Treated Teeth with Direct and Indirect Posts: A 5-Year Retrospective Evaluation at an Australian University Dental Clinic

Restoring endodontically treated teeth has always been a challenge in dentistry. Dental posts are used when further retention is required for the final restoration, indicating that the tooth is already structurally compromised. Varying survival rates have been reported by previous studies, and there does not seem to be consensus on what factors are favorable regarding the survival of teeth treated with dental posts. Background/Objectives: This study investigated the survival of teeth treated with direct and indirect posts placed by dentists and dental students at an Australian university over a five-year period. Methods: This retrospective study included 684 direct and indirect posts placed from January 2018 to December 2022 at Griffith University dental clinic. The survival of the teeth treated with dental posts was assessed using Kaplan–Meier analysis. The potential effect of patient, tooth and operator factors was assessed using Cox regression analysis. Results: The posts had a five-year survival rate of 94% and survival time of 46.16 months. No statistically significant difference in survival was noted between the different groups in this study. Conclusions: Teeth treated with dental posts have been shown to have good short-term survival; however, long-term survival could not be commented on. Within the limitations of this study, survival was not associated with the location of the tooth, type of tooth, operator expertise, post material, cement, restoration or opposing dentition.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Oral
Published
2025-02-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/oral5010007
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Dental Research and COVID-19
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.82
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Survival of Endodontically Treated Teeth with Direct and Indirect Posts: A 5-Year Retrospective Evaluation at an Australian University Dental Clinic

Lan Xiao, Menaka Abuzar, Tom Chau, Zhiyuan Li et al.
1 citations
Oral
Dental Research and COVID-19
2.82
article

Survival of Endodontically Treated Teeth with Direct and Indirect Posts: A 5-Year Retrospective Evaluation at an Australian University Dental Clinic

Lan Xiao, Menaka Abuzar, Tom Chau, Zhiyuan Li, Lavanya Ajay Sharma
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Restoring endodontically treated teeth has always been a challenge in dentistry. Dental posts are used when further retention is required for the final restoration, indicating that the tooth is already structurally compromised. Varying survival rates have been reported by previous studies, and there does not seem to be consensus on what factors are favorable regarding the survival of teeth treated with dental posts. Background/Objectives: This study investigated the survival of teeth treated with direct and indirect posts placed by dentists and dental students at an Australian university over a five-year period. Methods: This retrospective study included 684 direct and indirect posts placed from January 2018 to December 2022 at Griffith University dental clinic. The survival of the teeth treated with dental posts was assessed using Kaplan–Meier analysis. The potential effect of patient, tooth and operator factors was assessed using Cox regression analysis. Results: The posts had a five-year survival rate of 94% and survival time of 46.16 months. No statistically significant difference in survival was noted between the different groups in this study. Conclusions: Teeth treated with dental posts have been shown to have good short-term survival; however, long-term survival could not be commented on. Within the limitations of this study, survival was not associated with the location of the tooth, type of tooth, operator expertise, post material, cement, restoration or opposing dentition.

OralVol. 5(1)
Griffith University (AU), Nanjing University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Dental Research and COVID-19
2.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.