Biology’s Einstein Moment: Specifying Lineal Frames of Reference and Rejecting Absolute Biological History

Abstract We are currently in the midst of what I call biology’s Einstein moment. This is the rejection of absolute biological history, the idea that there is an invariant, privileged biological history against which other histories are measured or deviate from. Instead, biologists must specify theoretically and empirically motivated frames of lineal reference. This is already informing and advancing biological practice, theory, methods, and more, and is a significant and important feature of contemporary biology. Here I argue that it is worth identifying and naming this shift, and encouraging a deeper and broader embrace of it.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biological Theory
Published
2025-02-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13752-024-00475-3
Primary Topic
Philosophy and History of Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Biology’s Einstein Moment: Specifying Lineal Frames of Reference and Rejecting Absolute Biological History

Matthew H. Haber
Biological Theory
Philosophy and History of Science
article

Biology’s Einstein Moment: Specifying Lineal Frames of Reference and Rejecting Absolute Biological History

Matthew H. Haber
article en

Abstract

Abstract We are currently in the midst of what I call biology’s Einstein moment. This is the rejection of absolute biological history, the idea that there is an invariant, privileged biological history against which other histories are measured or deviate from. Instead, biologists must specify theoretically and empirically motivated frames of lineal reference. This is already informing and advancing biological practice, theory, methods, and more, and is a significant and important feature of contemporary biology. Here I argue that it is worth identifying and naming this shift, and encouraging a deeper and broader embrace of it.

Biological TheoryVol. 20(4)
University of Utah (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 98%
Philosophy and History of Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.