An experimental study of respiratory particle dispersion in an operating room under positive and negative pressurization

Hospital operating rooms (ORs) are typically maintained at positive pressure, which can increase the risk of disease transmission to healthcare workers and to spaces outside of the OR when an infected patient is present. This study investigates the influence of operating room pressurization (positive and negative) and dynamic healthcare worker (HCW) activity on respiratory particle dispersion, addressing gaps in understanding airflow dynamics and infection control. Experiments were conducted in a full-scale OR to simulate conditions with a continuous respiratory aerosol source and a cough source, analyzing particle concentration under varying pressurization scenarios and with anteroom interactions. Key findings reveal that negative pressurization effectively reduces respiratory particle concentrations across the OR, with a ventilation efficiency of 78 % compared to 59 % under positive pressurization. The use of an anteroom reduced particle concentrations by 25 % at the operating table and up to 31 % in the anteroom. Movement of healthcare workers significantly influenced aerosol dispersion, with particle concentrations increasing by 17.8 % at higher speeds (1.2 m/s) under positive pressure. Faster HCW movement increases particle spread, particularly under positive pressure. The inclusion of an anteroom further reduces particle migration to adjacent areas, emphasizing its importance in infection control strategies. The study's results highlight the effectiveness of negative pressure systems in mitigating airborne infectious disease transmission and demonstrate the value of anterooms in enhancing containment. These findings contribute to optimizing OR design and ventilation practices, providing evidence-based recommendations for safer healthcare environments, and delivers insights to inform future standards in building engineering for infection control. • Experiments show negative pressure reduces particle spread in an operating room. • Anterooms lower particle levels, helping control contamination. • Faster walking speeds increase particle spread by causing greater disturbances. • Negative pressure improved ventilation efficiency in all experimental conditions. • Particles from coughing are better controlled under negative pressurization.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Building Engineering
Published
2025-02-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2025.112009
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Infection Control and Ventilation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.04

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An experimental study of respiratory particle dispersion in an operating room under positive and negative pressurization

Md. Rafsan Nahian, Jeffrey A. Siegel, Reza Daneshazarian
2 citations
Journal of Building Engineering
Infection Control and Ventilation
3.04
article

An experimental study of respiratory particle dispersion in an operating room under positive and negative pressurization

Md. Rafsan Nahian, Jeffrey A. Siegel, Reza Daneshazarian
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Hospital operating rooms (ORs) are typically maintained at positive pressure, which can increase the risk of disease transmission to healthcare workers and to spaces outside of the OR when an infected patient is present. This study investigates the influence of operating room pressurization (positive and negative) and dynamic healthcare worker (HCW) activity on respiratory particle dispersion, addressing gaps in understanding airflow dynamics and infection control. Experiments were conducted in a full-scale OR to simulate conditions with a continuous respiratory aerosol source and a cough source, analyzing particle concentration under varying pressurization scenarios and with anteroom interactions. Key findings reveal that negative pressurization effectively reduces respiratory particle concentrations across the OR, with a ventilation efficiency of 78 % compared to 59 % under positive pressurization. The use of an anteroom reduced particle concentrations by 25 % at the operating table and up to 31 % in the anteroom. Movement of healthcare workers significantly influenced aerosol dispersion, with particle concentrations increasing by 17.8 % at higher speeds (1.2 m/s) under positive pressure. Faster HCW movement increases particle spread, particularly under positive pressure. The inclusion of an anteroom further reduces particle migration to adjacent areas, emphasizing its importance in infection control strategies. The study's results highlight the effectiveness of negative pressure systems in mitigating airborne infectious disease transmission and demonstrate the value of anterooms in enhancing containment. These findings contribute to optimizing OR design and ventilation practices, providing evidence-based recommendations for safer healthcare environments, and delivers insights to inform future standards in building engineering for infection control. • Experiments show negative pressure reduces particle spread in an operating room. • Anterooms lower particle levels, helping control contamination. • Faster walking speeds increase particle spread by causing greater disturbances. • Negative pressure improved ventilation efficiency in all experimental conditions. • Particles from coughing are better controlled under negative pressurization.

Journal of Building EngineeringVol. 102
University of Toronto (CA), Public Health Ontario (CA)
Mitacs
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Infection Control and Ventilation
3.04
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.