The Real Effect of Accounting for Software Development Costs on Corporate Innovation

This paper examines the real effects of accounting for software development costs on corporate innovation. We explore the adoption of SFAS 86 (Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software to be Sold, Leased, or Otherwise Marketed), which requires the capitalization of certain software development costs. We find that public software firms experience improvements in both innovation quantity and scientific quality, and their innovation strategies become riskier and more diversified following the adoption of the standard, compared to other high-tech public firms. Consistent with SFAS 86 helping to reduce agency-related costs, the real effect is more pronounced for software firms with greater financial constraints, higher analyst following, and lower concentrations of institutional shareholding. Overall, our study shows that accounting policies for software development costs have real implications not only for firms’ innovation output but also for their’ choices regarding the types of innovation to pursue.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Accounting Review
Published
2025-02-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2025.2455936
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.91

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Real Effect of Accounting for Software Development Costs on Corporate Innovation

Syed Aleem Haider, Hai Wu
1 citations
European Accounting Review
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
3.91
article

The Real Effect of Accounting for Software Development Costs on Corporate Innovation

Syed Aleem Haider, Hai Wu
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This paper examines the real effects of accounting for software development costs on corporate innovation. We explore the adoption of SFAS 86 (Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software to be Sold, Leased, or Otherwise Marketed), which requires the capitalization of certain software development costs. We find that public software firms experience improvements in both innovation quantity and scientific quality, and their innovation strategies become riskier and more diversified following the adoption of the standard, compared to other high-tech public firms. Consistent with SFAS 86 helping to reduce agency-related costs, the real effect is more pronounced for software firms with greater financial constraints, higher analyst following, and lower concentrations of institutional shareholding. Overall, our study shows that accounting policies for software development costs have real implications not only for firms’ innovation output but also for their’ choices regarding the types of innovation to pursue.

European Accounting Review
Australian National University (AU)
University of Technology Sydney
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
3.91
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Real Effect of Accounting for Software Development Costs on Corporate Innovation — Syed Aleem Haider, Hai Wu · European Accounting Review (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS