Comparison of Clinical Evidence Submitted to the FDA and EMA for Cell and Gene Therapies

This cross-sectional study compares how sponsors approach parallel submissions of gene and cell therapy applications to drug regulatory agencies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JAMA Internal Medicine
Published
2025-02-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2024.7569
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.33
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Clinical Evidence Submitted to the FDA and EMA for Cell and Gene Therapies

Magdi Elsallab, Florence T. Bourgeois, S Gillner
2 citations
JAMA Internal Medicine
Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
2.33
article

Comparison of Clinical Evidence Submitted to the FDA and EMA for Cell and Gene Therapies

Magdi Elsallab, Florence T. Bourgeois, S Gillner
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This cross-sectional study compares how sponsors approach parallel submissions of gene and cell therapy applications to drug regulatory agencies.

JAMA Internal MedicineVol. 185(4)
University of Bern (CH), Boston Children's Hospital (US), Harvard University (US), Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
2.33
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.