On the Jurisdictional Situations of Arctic Large Marine Ecosystems

Abstract The Arctic Council has identified and delineated 18 large marine ecosystems (LMEs) to provide a basis for the implementation of the ecosystem approach to management (EAM) in the Arctic. However, the ‘natural boundaries’ of these LMEs largely misalign with the ‘artificial boundaries’ established under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS). This raises the question of how EAM could be effectively implemented across diverse and multiple jurisdictions of the Arctic LMEs. By visualising the so-called jurisdictional situation of all 18 Arctic LMEs, this food-for-thought article highlights the inequitable and delicate position that the zonal approach of UNCLOS creates for the protection of Arctic LMEs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ICES Journal of Marine Science
Published
2025-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsaf006
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Arctic and Russian Policy Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On the Jurisdictional Situations of Arctic Large Marine Ecosystems

Katharina Heinrich, César Soares de Oliveira
1 citations
ICES Journal of Marine Science
Arctic and Russian Policy Studies
4.20
article

On the Jurisdictional Situations of Arctic Large Marine Ecosystems

Katharina Heinrich, César Soares de Oliveira
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract The Arctic Council has identified and delineated 18 large marine ecosystems (LMEs) to provide a basis for the implementation of the ecosystem approach to management (EAM) in the Arctic. However, the ‘natural boundaries’ of these LMEs largely misalign with the ‘artificial boundaries’ established under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS). This raises the question of how EAM could be effectively implemented across diverse and multiple jurisdictions of the Arctic LMEs. By visualising the so-called jurisdictional situation of all 18 Arctic LMEs, this food-for-thought article highlights the inequitable and delicate position that the zonal approach of UNCLOS creates for the protection of Arctic LMEs.

ICES Journal of Marine ScienceVol. 82(2)
University of Helsinki (FI), University of Eastern Finland (FI), Committee on Climate Change (GB), Joensuu Science Park (FI), University of Lapland (FI)
Academy of Finland, Maj ja Tor Nesslingin Säätiö
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Arctic and Russian Policy Studies
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.