Elevated scaled scores when using the digital version of the WISC-V coding subtest

This study investigated the digital version of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children, Fifth Edition (WISC-V) Coding subtest in a large Australian clinical and non-clinical sample of 6-11 year old children (<i>N</i> = 794). Data was retrospectively pooled from several studies. Results showed the digital Coding scaled score was significantly elevated compared with all other subtests (<i>M</i> difference = 2.01, 95% CI. 1.74-2.27). Overall FSIQ was higher when calculated using Coding compared with Symbol Search (<i>M</i> difference = 2.067, 95% CI. 1.79-2.34). The Coding and Symbol Search discrepancy in digital administration did not vary according to age and was unrelated to general intelligence. Girls scored higher on average than boys on the digital Coding subtest, but there was no sex effect for the digital Symbol Search subtest (girls: <i>M</i> = 10.76, 95% CI 10.41-11.12; boys: <i>M</i> = 10.27, 95% CI 9.92-10.63). Inflated digital Coding scaled scores were observed across our subsamples of clinical and non-clinical cases, without any significant group differences. Overall, our findings support the notion that the digital WISC-V Coding subtest is inflated, particularly for girls, supporting cessation in the digital administration of this subtest.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Child Neuropsychology
Published
2025-02-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/09297049.2025.2459444
Primary Topic
Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Elevated scaled scores when using the digital version of the WISC-V coding subtest

Jonathan M. Payne, Elisha K. Josev, Natalie A. Pride, Kristina M. Haebich et al.
Child Neuropsychology
Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare
article

Elevated scaled scores when using the digital version of the WISC-V coding subtest

Jonathan M. Payne, Elisha K. Josev, Natalie A. Pride, Kristina M. Haebich, Rachel Ellis, Kimberly Lau, Peter J. Anderson, Thi‐Nhu‐Ngoc Nguyen, Stephanie Malarbi, Alice Burnett
article en

Abstract

This study investigated the digital version of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children, Fifth Edition (WISC-V) Coding subtest in a large Australian clinical and non-clinical sample of 6-11 year old children (<i>N</i> = 794). Data was retrospectively pooled from several studies. Results showed the digital Coding scaled score was significantly elevated compared with all other subtests (<i>M</i> difference = 2.01, 95% CI. 1.74-2.27). Overall FSIQ was higher when calculated using Coding compared with Symbol Search (<i>M</i> difference = 2.067, 95% CI. 1.79-2.34). The Coding and Symbol Search discrepancy in digital administration did not vary according to age and was unrelated to general intelligence. Girls scored higher on average than boys on the digital Coding subtest, but there was no sex effect for the digital Symbol Search subtest (girls: <i>M</i> = 10.76, 95% CI 10.41-11.12; boys: <i>M</i> = 10.27, 95% CI 9.92-10.63). Inflated digital Coding scaled scores were observed across our subsamples of clinical and non-clinical cases, without any significant group differences. Overall, our findings support the notion that the digital WISC-V Coding subtest is inflated, particularly for girls, supporting cessation in the digital administration of this subtest.

Child NeuropsychologyVol. 31(7)
Children's Hospital of Orange County (US), Royal Children's Hospital (AU), Royal Women's Hospital (AU), The University of Melbourne (AU), University of California, Irvine (US), Mercy Hospital for Women (AU), Royal Ottawa Mental Health Centre (CA), Australian Regenerative Medicine Institute (AU), Children's Hospital at Westmead (AU), Murdoch Children's Research Institute (AU), Monash University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.